You are absolutely misrepresenting that case. So it is either because you don’t understand what you are reading OR you are doing it intentionally.
Since you left out
United States v. Wong Kim Ark,
which has a pretty strong DISSENTING opinion about natural born citizenship ...and a majority opinion about natural born citizens and allegience...
I am going to assume you are misleading on purpose to support your agenda.
I don’t do that.
I try to look at all sides.
Sigh. Nope. As I said we're going to have to agree to disagree because I happen to believe YOU are the one misrepresenting these various cases in your zeal to discount the TWO parents requirement. Minor v. Happersett was just one case, Wong Kim Ark was just one case, I cited more than just those and there is STILL last year's S.R. 511 which reaffirmed that John Sidney McCain was eligible based upon having been born to TWO CITIZENS (PLURAL) on a military base. That was the conclusion of S.R. 511 which OBAMA SIGNED.
So don't start with me about 'misleading' anything. YOU are the one who doesn't look at everything.
Furthermore if you had bothered to read "Kerchner v. Obama: Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss" you would notice that Mario Apuzzo cited the various cases I gave you and then some as to WHY its settled law and precedent that to be natural born requires TWO citizen parents.
It is absolutely absurd that anyone claiming fealty to the constitution would agree to allow anyone to be President who has a non-American Father!