The birth announcements are fake because the Obamas never lived at that address.
The address listed, 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, was the residenc of Orland Scott Lefforge, a Professor at UH at Manoa, Dept. of Speech, his wife Thelma, and their three children, all under 7-years of age in 1961. Later, Professor Lefforge became an assistant to Sen. Daniel Inouye in 1967. He died July 4, 2007 at the age of 91. His wife Thelma died June 12, 2008.
Ten days from Thelma Lefforge’s death is plenty of time to cut, typeset, & paste a new birth announcement. The announcements were scanned and emailed by the librarian in Hawaii to a blogger named Lori and then to the TD [texasdarling.wordpress.com] blog.
Not only are the announcements phoney, but Obama’s student file at Hawaii’s education department is missing, presumed stolen. Why? Because it is the only one that is missing AND would contains certified copy of his real birth certificate.
This is important to note: Professor Lefforge was a left-wing activist in Hawaii’s Democrat Party. This whole scenario has Democrat Party official’s fingerprints all over it.
They are desperate to keep the truth of Obama’s identity a secret.
Maybe so but here's my own experience thus I believe that a newspaper's birth announcement doesn't really mean anything vis-a-vis birthplace -- unless it includes the hospital.
There's no real proof from a hospital, I believe.
I was not born in a hospital. My birth was 27 Jan. and it was registered 3 Apr.
Form data include the address of birthplace (otherwise hospital name) and the residence address of the parents.
Who's going to know? If anything I prefer a birth outside the U.S. and a delayed registration using the Kalanianaole Highway address with permission of the owners.
There's a place on the form for an "attendant" to sign; to wit, M.D., midwife, or other; i.e., it can be "other" like in a friend. Though a doctor may have to sign that the baby is healthy.
BTW my long form B.C. is stamped "DELAY".
Or the information provided to the Department of Vital Statistics was false. If so, that points to a false application. Possibly with the wrong date given.
While it's not totatly impossible that Stanley Ann would travel to Seattle, from wherever, in the month following the birth of her first child, where both University of Washington records and the recollections of a friend, place her in late August of '61 in the latter case and mid to late September in the other, it seems unlikely. Unless "wherever" was very close to Seattle, that is not requiring a long plane ride or boat trip. Now there woudl be no reason to "fake" being born in Seattle, or anywhere else in Washington state. But Vancouver BC is "close", and it might be worthwhile faking birth in Hawai'i to disguise birth in Canada, just to have the child recorded as a US Citizen.