Maybe so but here's my own experience thus I believe that a newspaper's birth announcement doesn't really mean anything vis-a-vis birthplace -- unless it includes the hospital.
There's no real proof from a hospital, I believe.
I was not born in a hospital. My birth was 27 Jan. and it was registered 3 Apr.
Form data include the address of birthplace (otherwise hospital name) and the residence address of the parents.
Who's going to know? If anything I prefer a birth outside the U.S. and a delayed registration using the Kalanianaole Highway address with permission of the owners.
There's a place on the form for an "attendant" to sign; to wit, M.D., midwife, or other; i.e., it can be "other" like in a friend. Though a doctor may have to sign that the baby is healthy.
BTW my long form B.C. is stamped "DELAY".
“I was not born in a hospital. My birth was 27 Jan. and it was registered 3 Apr.”
I don’t want to seem rude, but what does that have to do with the Democrat’s phoneying up newspaper birth announcements?
The late Lefforge’s neighbor (who has live in that neighborhood for over fifty years) has gone on record stating that a Mr. and Mrs. Obama never lived next door.
What part of this is so difficult to understand? The birth announcements are fake.