Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, Clinton, McCaskill ORIGINAL 'BIRTHERS' (April 10, 2008): Scrubbing McCain's NBC Status
govtrack.us ^ | April 10, 2008 | govtrack.us

Posted on 07/22/2009 8:09:58 PM PDT by txhurl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: montanajoe
He will then be able to label everyone opposing him as right wing racist wing nuts and the public pushed by the media will buy it handing the GOP a final disastrous defeat.

Then how do you explain his father's status, or his adoption to Indonesia???

41 posted on 07/22/2009 9:39:28 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: danamco
I'm saying he is going to come up with a genuine or undetectable forgery saying he was born in Hawaii that will be accepted by the mainstream media and in turn the general public. I think he has planned this all along..
42 posted on 07/22/2009 9:44:08 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-511


43 posted on 07/22/2009 9:48:07 PM PDT by SiVisPacemParaBellum (Peace through superior firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Enough to link it.

http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/obamas-birth-certificate-conspiracy-sr-511-and-faithless-electors/

S. Res.511 clearly states that “…Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States…”

Whereas, a natural born Citizen is not defined? Hold your horses there and re-read. Natural born citizen is not defined. Hmmmmmmm? The bill states, ” Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President…” This piece of legislation was introduced, written and passed clearly with intent to extend the meaning of the Constitution, and prior to SR 511 there was no presidency in Congress.

Mrs. Clinton’s support and co-authorship of this bill, even though they were battling in the primary election for the presidency, was so incredibly strategic and manipulative on Obama’s part that it borders on absolute fraud. The bill completely attempts to redefine his citizenship and will try to keep him eligible, constitutionally as the 44th President, even after he finally shows his Official Vault Birth Certificate.


Author assumes he has one.


44 posted on 07/22/2009 9:53:10 PM PDT by txhurl (Put the pressure on and keep it on until this administration snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC; txhurl; MHGinTN; LucyT
Time for a civics lesson.

Here's one ;)

The Founders wanted the President to be a NBC to ensure that the ONE person sitting at the top of the Executive branch has UNQUESTIONABLE, UNWAVERING loyalty to the United States, first and foremost. They did NOT want someone loyal to King George (or his successors) to regain power over the independent colonies. Some even questioned George Washington, but from before 1776 and beyond, Gen. Washington had proven himself loyal to the independent colonies to all but his staunchest critics.

At one point in Constitutional discussions, the delegates in 1787 considered THREE “presidents” in the Executive for “checks and balances.” They ALSO considered a NBC clause for Senators as well. Debating those issues, they felt that a NBC clause for Senators would limit the pool of possible candidates and could cause bad feelings with immigrants needed to “jump start” the newly-formed Republic.

In the end, the Framers compromised that Senators be required to be US residents for 9 years, while striking the NBC clause for the office. The Framers understood that even though the US is a "nation of immigrants," INTERNAL Checks and Balances by sheer numbers of US citizens should prevent "foreign interests" from overwhelming the House and Senate (which, of course, had far fewer Senators and Representatives than we have today with 50 states).

The Framers also compromised on ONE Executive vs THREE. But as a type of “check and balance,” the Framers inserted a "blood loyalty" requirement in Art II, Sect. 1, Clause 5: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President...”

The NBC clause was NOT an accident, nor was it an inane rule to be restrictive to immigrants, and it certainly isn't just a "political" issue ... LOYALTY to the Republic is the reason the NBC clause was inserted into the Constitution for the POTUS.

Consider the "Checks and Balances" in the US Constitution ...

535 Members of the US Congress here and

9 Justices in the US Supreme Court here

But only - ONE - US Executive here


45 posted on 07/22/2009 9:59:19 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

If the Constitution is being set aside for the convenience of the Democratic Party, then I suggest we go buy some slaves and ban women from voting. These prohibitions disadvantage slave owners and men...


46 posted on 07/22/2009 9:59:34 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BP2

I do so enjoy your posts. I envy your patience, too.


47 posted on 07/22/2009 10:03:21 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

The Constitutional contract is being abrogated by the federal oligarchs, so that they can sweep away the old Republic. It is happening before your eyes and the vast majority of Americans have not a clue because they have become dependents, and have been programmed to lap up the enemdia bilge and like it.


48 posted on 07/22/2009 10:05:26 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BP2

bttt


49 posted on 07/22/2009 10:13:02 PM PDT by txhurl (Put the pressure on and keep it on until this administration snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Fear not! There are plenty enough of us to keep that from happening. Just be ready... Remember the State House lawn when they wanted to adopt an income tax? That was fun!


50 posted on 07/22/2009 10:15:34 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

bump


51 posted on 07/22/2009 10:23:50 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; danamco
When Mr. Obama produces his true Birth Certificate, and it confirms what is shown on the Certification of Live Birth, the case is closed.

I'll call Mr. Obama on that bluff.

The Certification of Live Birth ROOT DOCUMENT (or lack thereof) will create more questions than it will answer ... like: WHERE THE HELL was his dear mum February-August 1961? (see the timeline below):


    June 1960 -- Ann moved to Hawaii with Parents (exact date unknown)
    Sept 1960 -- Ann started classes at U of Hawaii (exact date: Sept. 26, 1960)
    Oct 1960 -- Got pregnant by Obama SR
    Feb 1961 -- Married Obama SR (Feb. 2, 1961)   ANN'S EXACT AGE: 18 years, 2 months, 5 days
-- a big, six-month void --
    Aug 1961 -- Gave birth to Obama JR on Aug. 4, 1961 (reportedly in Hawaii and on that date)   ANN'S EXACT AGE: 18 years, 8 months, 7 days
    Aug 1961 -- Sighting by Susan Blake in late-August on Mercer Island, Seattle (Obama Jr reportedly 3 weeks old) -- SHE'S TRAVELING FROM HAWAII TO SEATTLE, in 1961, WITH A 3-WK-OLD, only to ship the baby BACK to start classes in Seattle? HUH?! ...
    Fall 1961 -- Attended classes in Seattle at University of Washington (see transcripts below), but not with University of Hawaii in Spring of 1961 -- possible BREAK in Hawaiian Residency status, depending on when she left Hawaii
    Fall 1961 -- a Listing for Stanley Ann Obama appears in the 1961 Polk directory at the Seattle Public Library: "Obama Anna Mrs studt h516 13th Ave. E. apt. 2"
    1961-1962 -- Anna Obama phone listing, as listed in Seattle Reverse Directory, 1961-1962: "Obama Anna Mrs EA3-3346" at "516 Villa Ria Apartments"
    Mar 1962 -- Mary Toutonghi babysat Obama Jr at Ann Dunham (aka Anna Obama) apartment for two months (through May 1962)
    Sum 1962 -- Sighting by John W. Hunt in June-Sept 1962 "I had moved to Utah for a while after high school, and I came back to Seattle in the summer of 1962. I remember visiting the World's Fair, and then stopping by Stanley Ann's apartment on Capitol Hill. It was a small apartment, upstairs. It was after June, and could have been as late as September, 1962. I visited her for half a day or so. It was after the end of the spring quarter classes, and she wasn't in classes, and didn't have a job. I recall her being melancholy at the time. I had a sense that something wasn't right in her."
    Fall 1962 -- Ann Dunman is no longer registered for classes at University of Washington
    Fall 1962 -- Obama SR begins school at Harvard, in Boston, Mass.
    Sept-Dec 1962 -- Ann moves back to Hawaii, with baby Obama, to live with parents
    Spring 1963 -- Ann Dunham resumes school back at  University of Hawaii at Manoa
    Jan 1964 -- Ann Dunham files for divorce in Hawaii Court
    Mar 1964 -- Divorce is granted (Obama SR does not respond to divorce notice in Boston)

52 posted on 07/22/2009 10:25:03 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe
I would think that would backfire O so big..

If he produces the BC just before the midterm elections it just proves he had not ever before produced this simple piece of paper everyone was asking for...

So by then no matter what he produces it come with dubious believability at best (think Nixon and the tape, Hillary and the billing records)

The big question becomes why the stonewalling why the stall for time what did they need time to hide or alter...

I think Obama' safe window to produce something new on this has just about closed..

The why's of the stalling and the stonewalling are now becoming the red flag question

Remember in politics it not the little crime it the big stonewalling and cover up that kill you

53 posted on 07/22/2009 10:54:57 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thanks!


54 posted on 07/22/2009 11:55:30 PM PDT by scott7278 (Obama, Klaatu barada nikto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

I really don’t care about the BC. It’s merely icing on the cake. By his own admission, he is not natural born - his father was a Kenyan citizen, and his own affiliated website documents that he possessed Kenyan citizenship until 1982, when it expired at the age of 21.

This is exactly what the Founding Fathers desired to avoid - a ruler who governs not according to American ideals or the U.S Constitution, but to the other interests of a foreign land.

Which is what we have now.


55 posted on 07/23/2009 12:02:56 AM PDT by scott7278 (Obama, Klaatu barada nikto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BP2

BTTT


56 posted on 07/23/2009 12:04:37 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

The issue is ultimately not whether Obama is a U.S. citizen, but whether he is a natural born citizen. Claiming he’s not a citizen is the trap that will backfire.

We can’t let the DNC or the media lead us into that narrative.


57 posted on 07/23/2009 12:08:53 AM PDT by scott7278 (Obama, Klaatu barada nikto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

bkmk


58 posted on 07/23/2009 12:38:15 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Either that or it’s a clue they’re lying, or just incompetent. Which do you think? We will find out as this unravels.


59 posted on 07/23/2009 3:29:40 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: danamco
He needs to be frog marched directly to Leavenworth and kept forever!!

With all due respect, I completely disagree. Obama has committed High Treason against this nation. According to our constitution I believe that is an execution offense.

I concur with the constitution. There is no need to waste our taxdollars keeping this evil man imprisoned for life when an example so harsh should be set that NO ONE ELSE EVER CONTEMPLATES THIS AGAIN!

The man should be executed immediately and all those who have aided and abetted him....including members of congress, the DNC, the media, et. al.........

60 posted on 07/23/2009 5:01:14 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson