Posted on 07/22/2009 8:09:58 PM PDT by txhurl
bttt
This resolution only demonstrates to me that O's strategy from the very beginning..
If I were Congress, I would start shying away from Obama.
This crucial evidence as to the Framers’ intent is of such supreme importance to this debate that it deserves a posting of its own.
Yep, that’s a possibility.
Time for a civics lesson.
LOL ORIGINAL BIRTHERS
Flashback: proof of the left’s selective rules.
They can run but they can’t hide!
He will then be able to label everyone opposing him as right wing racist wing nuts
He still has to explain McCaskill trying to put together legislation changing the two citizens parents requirement to one citizens parent.
This is one case where he can’t bury the record.
Source that cite (it obviously came from somewhere else, since “SEE THAT EDITION BELOW” is left hanging), and then start a thread in Bloggers & Personal. Doesn’t matter where you put it, it’ll show up on the main screen on the “Articles” tab or the “Comments” tab, and will be seen. I say “Bloggers & Personal” so you won’t get flamed for a vanity in News & Activism.
One the flip side if you only have one parent that is a U.S.C. then it depends on when you were born.
For example, birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.
ping
YES -- BUT understand, that the SCOTUS has elected NOT to consider NBC, as they feel it's a Congressional matter.
ALSO understand that out of nearly 30 other attempts by Congress to (re)define "Natural Born Citizen" since the 1870s, S. Res 511 is the ONLY formal Resolution from the House or Senate on "Natural Born Citizen" to make it out of Committee.
Start by checking the Congressional Record (http://thomas.loc.gov/) for:
-- S. 2678 (2008)
-- H. J. RES. 15 (2005)
-- H. J. RES. 104 (2004)
-- H. J. RES. 47 (2001)
-- in the 80s, attempts were added to "English as the official US language" legislation
-- ... and further back ...
For those who care to do the research, you'll discover that this is the case ...
Which means from you logic that after O controls the congress they are free to pass legislation, not just a resolution, defining a NBC to suit their political purposes..
At THIS point in the Natural Born Citizen "discussion" -- I dare them to try that ... I REALLY do!
Congress is not able to define the Constitutional term “natural-born citizen” or the requirements of such for the Presidency and the Vice Presidency, barring a Constitutional Convention.
Congres is, however, Constitutionally tasked with determining other citizenship matters, specifically naturalization.
Freeper Beckwith has done just that at FR, and the material can be found at his Netpage, http://www.theobamafile.com
Chrissy, crybaby, Matthews needs to get the word..he is spitting mad at this outrage by those of us who are offended that our Constitution is being so tramped upon by this more white than black Kenyan..
That is a far to easy solution!
He needs to be frog marched directly to Leavenworth and kept forever!!
Together with a whole bunch of dems and pubs as well!!!
NOT AT ALL!
There is whole bunch of other requirements that need to be met!!
His father was NOT a U.S. citizen, therefor the case is NOT closed!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.