The poster, although a case could be made for the original author as well.
This is what passes for a "quality poster" on FR now..
SCP: Are you referring to the author of this tripe or the poster who posted the article?
BW: The poster, although a case could be made for the original author as well.
BW, you've criticized ECO as being unfit to teach science based on his posting of this article, and you've criticized the author of the article for reporting the conclusions the researchers have reached, but ZILCH on the validity of the conclusions of said researchers.
So, bucky, do you not have any problem with the premise of the research and conclusions of the evolutionary scientists? Why are you criticizing the people who posted and reported and not the researchers for using the ToE to justify this garbage?
It only goes to reinforce my contention that evos are not reading the articles and are just reacting to the fact that it was posted by a non-evo.
It certainly appears that evos are so blinded by their hatred of creationists that they just knee jerk a reaction instead of really thinking about what the original article says.