SCP: Are you referring to the author of this tripe or the poster who posted the article?
BW: The poster, although a case could be made for the original author as well.
BW, you've criticized ECO as being unfit to teach science based on his posting of this article, and you've criticized the author of the article for reporting the conclusions the researchers have reached, but ZILCH on the validity of the conclusions of said researchers.
So, bucky, do you not have any problem with the premise of the research and conclusions of the evolutionary scientists? Why are you criticizing the people who posted and reported and not the researchers for using the ToE to justify this garbage?
It only goes to reinforce my contention that evos are not reading the articles and are just reacting to the fact that it was posted by a non-evo.
It certainly appears that evos are so blinded by their hatred of creationists that they just knee jerk a reaction instead of really thinking about what the original article says.
What makes this “evolutionary science”? Thank God you don’t teach science either. Except, perhaps, within your cult.
Forrest is just a mindless drone, defending or rationalizing the leftist status quo where ever it may be found. So are many if not most of the “evo” posters on FR. Check their histories. The majority never reply outside Crevo threads, and are indistinguishable from posters to DU or Kos, when they do reply.
It could be that posters don't have enough time or it could be that more prefer to stay in the stands than play on the field.
Modern rapists, etc., are reverting to their caveman behavior, such aquired charactistics, behavior, ala Lamark, are then subject to natural selection and become part of the genetic code.
If Lamarkism was wrong, then Freud and socio-biology was wrong and Darwinian natural selection as the basis of human was wrong.
The recycled Freudian claptrap of Thornbill, et al, is just as wrong as it always has been.
Thanks for the ping, mm.