Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Start To Push Back Hard To Prevent A 'Waterloo'
National Journal ^ | 7/22/2009 | National Journal

Posted on 07/22/2009 6:30:59 AM PDT by NMEwithin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: NMEwithin
I thought 0bama didn't know what was in the bill.

If he doesn't know what is in the bill, how can he know that NOT passing it will be his Waterloo?

If it does pass, it will be our waterloo as a nation.

"All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth....
could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected?
I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad.
If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.
As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide."

Abraham Lincoln

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

21 posted on 07/22/2009 6:45:55 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

“We rescued the economy,”

Conventional wisdom would make you think that the way this is negatively sweeping across the blogs, Oblahblah would back away from making a statement like that. However, his ego won’t let him and he’ll probably say it anyway. Our difficulty will be getting the State Run Media and Republicans to repeat it endlessly as the economy continues to nose dive. Like the Clintons (only to a greater extent), Oblahblah has been used to having complete and total media support and can say pretty much anything and not be called on it. Remember all of those Clinton speeches where he would sound so eloquent, but when it was parsed out, he said nothing?


22 posted on 07/22/2009 6:47:06 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin; All
"...and the president says, 'You're going to destroy my presidency.' "


23 posted on 07/22/2009 6:47:14 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
Party before principle...it never fails.

It's the Democrat way. Look at their history. Why should we expect anything different?

24 posted on 07/22/2009 6:47:17 AM PDT by bcsco (When Obama mentioned shovel ready jobs, I never thought he might be thinking of graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aegiscg47

I perhaps agree on the timing but the Waterloo metaphor is well-suited. This guy acts more like a Napolean than a U.S. President. Destroy his Presidency? Doubt it. Slow down his Marxist agenda? I most certainly hope and pray so.


25 posted on 07/22/2009 6:47:35 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
"Dems Start To Push Back Hard To Prevent A 'Waterloo'"


26 posted on 07/22/2009 6:47:38 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (will work for bailout bonus.... Twitter: maddawggmorgan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57

Sometimes ZERO forgets his own jive talkin from the day before. It’s the nature of talking in lies.


27 posted on 07/22/2009 6:47:56 AM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Demint destroyed America’s future with his boasting.


28 posted on 07/22/2009 6:49:12 AM PDT by omega4179 (Ø happened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57
This moron is going to learn real quick that unlike the press, the congress would care less about whether his presidency is destroy they only care about their power and their reelection.
29 posted on 07/22/2009 6:49:23 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

It’s not about Blue Dog courage. I wouldn’t trust their courage as far as I can throw Obama’s 30-ton ego.

What it’s about is the constituents of the Blue Dog Democrats learning about what’s in these bills, indeed, learning the fact that Congress isn’t even writing bills anymore but that the lobbyists and the congressional staff are creating huge slush funds of unheard of amounts of money to be doled out by bureaucrats to control the intimate details of everyone’s life for decades to come.

It’s the constituents of the Blue Dog Democrats who hold the key. If the BDDs understand that their electoral success is tied to the defeat of these “bills,” they aren’t going to sacrifice their futures to save Zero’s butt (which is what “his presidency” is—his butt).

But if they think that crafting a “compromise” that gets 90% of Zero’s agenda through while giving the impression that the “evil” first draft was defeated will placate voters, get them reelected while also placating BamBam,

THEY’LL DO IT.

Information is the key here. People have to inform people, their friends, family, students, employers what’s really in these “bills.” And then people have to push back at their legislators.

But the “courage of the Blue Dog Democrats”—that’s not worth wasting any of your time on. Political forces have to win this battle, as they always have to win or lose political battles.

Courage and Democrats do not fit in the same breath.


30 posted on 07/22/2009 6:50:14 AM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

The “blue dogs” will fold, they are Democrats after all. They have no moral compass.


31 posted on 07/22/2009 6:51:20 AM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

“and the president says, ‘You’re going to destroy my presidency.’ “

I guess if threats don’t work, groveling and whining might. What a horrible excuse for a man!


32 posted on 07/22/2009 6:52:17 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The ONLY good thing that can come of this will be Republicans retaking both houses of Congress in the next election.


33 posted on 07/22/2009 6:58:38 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
Interesting tidbit here I had not read before that will affect me (obamma taking more of money):

Kerry's idea is similar to a proposal pushed in 1994 by former Sen. Bill Bradley, D-N.J., and approved by the Finance Committee that would tax the difference between the average health insurance premium in a region and insurers' higher-cost plans.

Unions have come out heavily against that proposal because of the potential for higher costs to be passed down to workers. Most big companies offer their own insurance plans to employees, meaning the pain could be spread beyond the insurance industry.

An industry source expressed concern that "self-insured" company plans would be victimized, noting a 2008 Kaiser Family Foundation survey that found 77 percent of firms with more than 200 employees fund their own workers' benefits, rather than contract with an outside insurer. That figure goes up for firms with 1,000 or more workers, where the vast majority are self-insured, said Marisa Milton, vice president for healthcare policy and government relations at the HR Policy Association.

Finance members are looking at the exclusion that protects employees from paying taxes on employer-based health benefits to try to reduce the growth of healthcare spending, but have run into pushback from Democratic leaders and Obama.

34 posted on 07/22/2009 7:00:12 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astounded
Could it be that there are a few democrat politicians who -unlike Obama - put the interests of Americans and America ahead of personal agenda? Could it be?

ROFLOL oh that's hilarious, a Dem giving a darn about the country. Now a Dem from a red district who puts his personal agenda about being reelected in 2010 above supporting Obama, that appears a lot more likely.
35 posted on 07/22/2009 7:01:24 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

LOL


36 posted on 07/22/2009 7:03:48 AM PDT by truthkeeper ("Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

>and the president says, ‘You’re going to destroy my presidency.’

And that’s bad _HOW_?


37 posted on 07/22/2009 7:05:41 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

I agree. We need to call those Senators.

How can they vote on a bill they haven’t read and the President doesn’t know what is in it but says you must vote for it.

It boogles my mind that such a sweeping overhaul is getting rushed through.

The government can’t do anything right that they oversee...they aren’t going to get health care right either. It will be one big nightmare.


38 posted on 07/22/2009 7:08:10 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
How can they vote on a bill they haven’t read and the President doesn’t know what is in it but says you must vote for it.

If the Republicans ever get back into power they should pass a law that requires that all persons, Senate or House voting in favor of a bill must sign that they have read fully the document they are voting for. This should have the full penalty of law such that if proven they didn't read it they would be dismissed from government service and loose their pensions and benefits.

After all they have passed similar laws that CEOs have to sign that they have read all the companies financial documents, why shouldn't they have to do the same? And the CEOs are threatened with jail time and confiscation of assets, not just getting canned.

At least they won't have the excuse that they didn't know what they are signing, and it would reduce the number of 10,000 page boondoggles that are rushed through the congress at 3:am. I know it would take them all year just to get through the budget. But heck the less congress does the better off the nation is in the long run.
39 posted on 07/22/2009 7:16:51 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Brilliant idea, and anyone running who wants to win will run on this.


40 posted on 07/22/2009 7:19:01 AM PDT by truthkeeper ("Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson