[freedumb2003]

Healthy debate and self-checking by the science community.

Sounds like science checks and balances are in force and doing their job.

There really isn’t such a thing as an “Evolutionist.” There are scientists who specialize in TToE and other life sciences. Most scientists (> 99%) understand TToE. The handful who don’t are letting their agenda override their learning and aren’t “scientists” by any meaningful definition of the term.

Have a blessed day!

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

There really isn’t such a thing as an “Evolutionist.”

Well this is a new twist. An evolutionist who claims evolutionists do not exist. Did you ever hear this before, Fichori?

[tpanther]

There really isn’t such a thing as an “Evolutionist.” There are scientists who specialize in TToE and other life sciences. Most scientists (> 99%) understand TToE. The handful who don’t are letting their agenda override their learning and aren’t “scientists” by any meaningful definition of the term.

Where'd 99% come from and since when did scientists educated at Harvard, Princeton Johns Hopkins, etc. etc. etc. not count and meet the definition of scientists?

See, it's painfully obvious to the normal peolple where the agenda comes in here on this thread, when making these kinds of wild and bizarre and ludicrous assertions.