You said — The difference is that you have accepted that as legit. Most conservatives have not.
—
Well, that’s where you’ve got a misunderstanding then. I’m saying that it’s irrelevant what is on a website. What is *relevant* is what is required to be produced and shown *by law*. And until that happens, it doesn’t matter what is shown on a website.
The *key* is to close the loophole. Nothing that is ever said or speculated about or analyzed or *anything* about something on a website shown as an image document, will make a bit of difference in a court of law.
Until “that law” comes into play (which doesn’t exist yet), which requires specific documentation being given, the required procedures for being a candidate for President of the United States have been followed, just as prior candidates have done. That’s why no court is going to do anything about removing Obama from office (and why none has done so, thus far).
I’m saying to get on with what is going to close the loophole in order to get the documentation that everyone wants.
How can it be irrelevant what is on the website (the COLB) when:
A. The Obama camp and ALL his defenders point to his "birth certificate" posted on the website as 'proof' of NBC status.
B. That document has irrefutably been shown to have been a doctored image. That in itself is illegal.
C. If it is later demonstrated through one of these lawsuits that he is not what the COLB claims (a NBC) then he will have to vacate the office and probably be subject to prosecution.
I’m saying to get on with what is going to close the loophole in order to get the documentation that everyone wants.
No one here is arguing that the loophole should not be closed going forward. We all agree.
But when you have a marxist fraud pretending to be president, you use legal means necessary to get rid of him ASAP.
Nothing says we can't do more than one thing at a time....We need to do both/all.