Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge teaser on new Rasmussen 2012 poll: Obama v. Romney and Obama v. Palin
Drudgereport ^ | July 20, 2009 | Drudge

Posted on 07/20/2009 5:58:17 AM PDT by Al B.

POLL TO BE RELEASED AT 10:30 AM ET:

...

OBAMA 45 ROMNEY 45

OBAMA 48 PALIN 42

...

DEVELOPING.....


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: dnc4romney; helpmakerinosextinct; justsaynotomitt; libs4romney; loserpalin; moderates4mitt; nomoreplastichair; paidshillsformitt; palin; palin2012; palincrash; pds; pimpromney; pimpromneythread; rino; rinoromney; romney; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneyelection2012; sarahpalin; whenmittbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 last
To: who knows what evil?

Maybe so, but it was still republicans in closed primaries that voted for McCain.


181 posted on 07/20/2009 8:14:48 PM PDT by ellery (It's a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: section9

It’s actually astounding. THis poll was taken a week after she she basically quit politics in what even a supporter of hers such as myself had to admit was a puzzling move. One thing you can’t do in politics, sports, any public endeavor is be seen as a quitter. She basically said I’m taking my ball and going home. THe natl media who had already crucified her spent 10 striaght days laughing at her and ridiculing her even further.

She has 2.5 yrs experience as Gov of a state with a population of 600k. No military experience. No economic credentials. No natl security expertise. No nothing.

The President is the Messiah, the most popular man in the world with unlimited money and the entire media having propped him up for 3 straight years now as the greatest man to ever live.

With all that...he can’t even top 50% against her. Can’t top 45% against Romney.

Not a good sign for Obama.

The bottom line is if the economy recovers he’ll win in 2012, if it doesn’t he’ll lose. If you look at history, you can look at any election, examine the economic conditions at the time and also factor in any war situation/huge scandal, look at the money factor, the incumbent’s approval rating, and you’ll basically be able to know who wins.

the candidates and camapigns are largely meaningless in the end. ANy democrat would have won last yr, any Republican would have lost. Doesn’t matter who. Chris Dodd would have won if he was the nominee. Once the economy tanked in Spetembet the election was over.

It would be like Usain Bolt getting ready to race Tyson Gay in the 100M this weekend and Gay breaks his leg in a warmup. He’d be finished. The economic and market collapse was the euivalent of a broken leg.


182 posted on 08/13/2009 9:27:21 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

We still have 3.5 years of Obama. Waaaayyyy too soon


183 posted on 08/13/2009 9:31:34 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Do we really have to spell out why Romney will never win a national election...


184 posted on 08/13/2009 9:38:18 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson