1 posted on
07/20/2009 12:26:27 AM PDT by
neverdem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: neverdem
Carbon dioxide (CO2) gets a bad rep for contributing to global warming, and deservedly so.
What causes the so-called global warming now is the hot air all the politicians and lawyers are spewing up every time they say something. Every time you see a politician's lips move, they are spewing CO2 and lies.
Just look at Osama Obama for the biggest example.
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
3 posted on
07/20/2009 12:51:44 AM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
“It's possible that other greenhouse gases such as methane could have contributed to the [PETM] warming,” Zeebe says. It's also possible that the models are underestimating the climate response to CO2 increases. If that's the case, it “would mean our understanding of the climate system is incomplete,” he says.”
OR maybe they are over estimating the effects of co2, but perish the thought since ignorance only works in one direction.
4 posted on
07/20/2009 12:53:11 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: neverdem
Maybe the sun got a little hotter. One would have to have a full understanding of these star energy systems to think they are a perfectly stable system. What if the nuclear fusion activity of the sun has energy spikes which affects the Earth's climate systems?
5 posted on
07/20/2009 12:57:37 AM PDT by
jonrick46
(The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
To: neverdem
These guys missed the memo?
The humanoid aliens from the distant planet Garbonski 3 shot a massive chunk, almost 1/3, of the asteroid belt into the sun just about that time. The resultant flares and hard radiation killed the inhabitants of Venus - the lizard people of Delton 16, the long-time enemy of the humanoid aliens. Today, the lizard people are long dead and gone, all trace destroyed by the now boiling surface of Venus.
The positive side effect was the eventual rise of humans.
I submit my theory is s provable as the CO2 theory currently proposed by these scientists.
6 posted on
07/20/2009 1:03:57 AM PDT by
ASOC
(Who is that fat lady? And why is she singing???)
To: neverdem
I have come to the conclusion scientists are buffoons. No matter what happens, they think CO2 is the culprit. They are not thinking like scientists, but ideologs hellbent on promoting an agenda.
7 posted on
07/20/2009 1:07:22 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: neverdem
The whole article is a glaring indictment of how utterly ignorant these so-called "scientists" truly are.......essentially the article states,"...it could be this, or it could be that, but we really don't know if it's either thing or something we haven't even thought of."
Is it just me or does that not sound like pure dumba$$ery?
9 posted on
07/20/2009 1:08:40 AM PDT by
brent13a
(You're a Great American! NO you're a Great American! NO NO NO YOU'RE a Great American! Nooo.....WTF?)
To: neverdem
Hummmmm???
Lets see, what great minds might find this distressing???
To: neverdem
Hummmmm???
Lets see, what great minds might find this distressing???
To: neverdem
So the earth had CO2 levels 5X today’s and temperatures 9 degrees hotter on average, and it survived? It also readjusted without any cap and trade laws. If that’s true, then what’s the whole climate crisis about? We don’t have to do anything. It’ll fix itself...or maybe the cooling will be a bigger problem. Ice ages aren’t nice to humans.
14 posted on
07/20/2009 1:22:13 AM PDT by
JeanLM
To: neverdem
New research reveals that something else also seems to have warmed the planet during that time, though no one's quite sure what it was. Look up into the sky during the day. See that big glowing yellow ball in the sky? It's called "The Sun". It's a big ball of nuclear reactions that warm the planet. I suggest starting there.
To: neverdem
“We can’t tax what lived 55 million years ago but we can sure tax em now.”
19 posted on
07/20/2009 3:19:08 AM PDT by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: neverdem; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
20 posted on
07/20/2009 3:37:15 AM PDT by
steelyourfaith
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
To: neverdem
But scientists say they can't entirely blame the greenhouse gas for a curious spike in Earth's temperature 55 million years ago. Dinosaurs driving SUV's?
23 posted on
07/20/2009 4:55:50 AM PDT by
6SJ7
(atlasShruggedInd: ON)
To: neverdem
Guess the people of Atlantis drove their cars back and forth to the pyramids a bit too often. Or was it the dinosaurs switching on their air conditioners all summer that did it?
To: neverdem
All the charts I have seen show that CO2 concentrations have always risen after
25 posted on
07/20/2009 5:02:37 AM PDT by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shoIt is, indeed,'oting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: neverdem
Carbon dioxide (CO2) gets a bad rep for contributing to global warming, and deservedly so.
Talk about begging the question. Another writer who's afraid of not genuflecting to Algore and his minions.
28 posted on
07/20/2009 5:12:12 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: neverdem
New research reveals that something else also seems to have warmed the planet during that time, though no one's quite sure what it was.
How about the SUN!!!
29 posted on
07/20/2009 7:04:32 AM PDT by
painter
(No wonder democrats don't mind taxes.THEY DON'T PAY THEM !)
To: neverdem
There’s no good news here, “ It’s also possible that the models are underestimating the climate response to CO2 increases. If that’s the case, it “would mean our understanding of the climate system is incomplete,”
This has already been picked up to mean that there are positive forcings we need to add to our models even though their character is uncertain; so far no negative forcings have made the list of possible model runs.
32 posted on
07/20/2009 4:21:55 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
34 posted on
07/20/2009 7:17:52 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson