Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another development for the inexperienced Commander-in-Chief to address. He was slightly less qualified than Sarah Palin to be VP, but unfortunately the electorate chose to make him Prez, with Biden as a backstop (aka, "anti-assassination insurance"). Now they will have to live with the consequences until they get another opportunity to choose a prez.
1 posted on 07/18/2009 3:11:29 AM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
He was slightly less qualified than Sarah Palin to be VP

Obama is absolutely unqualified for any political job beyond Community Organizer.

2 posted on 07/18/2009 3:14:02 AM PDT by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
Does this mean the Iraqis are finally going to take responsibility for taking care of their own country rather than expecting us to do all the work?
3 posted on 07/18/2009 3:14:26 AM PDT by Rodebrecht (What are you and who do you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek

When a large attack on US forces in Iraq occurs (surely by them Barry will have ordered the troops to carry unloaded weapons), and the MSM throw up their hands in horror, guess who’ll be blamed? Either GWB or Sarah Palin. Depending.


4 posted on 07/18/2009 3:14:48 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek

Doesn’t matter.

It’s not really you who choose the Prez, it’s the CFR, and Rockefeller who choose him.


5 posted on 07/18/2009 3:18:33 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
Once U.S. troops are all out of Iraq, and maybe sooner, Iraq will revert to its same old, ages-old Islamic waste-hole.

We leave Iraq with no basis for any changes in its essential character as an Islamic state — we leave it an Islamic state, and that's where the problem is to begin with.

I am not laying this on President Bush. It is to be laid on the general notion that a nation can be changed in its violent behavior without changing the real source of its violent aspirations -— ISLAM.

Islamists can now hold their conferences for condemning America right on our own soil, American Christians can be chased, shoved, and slapped off of public streets in Dearborne, Michigan, American flags are burned and trampled in American street gutters by anti-American slogan-yelling Muslims while Americans just gaze in bewilderment.

Bring all Iraqis to America thinking that when they see the freedom of America that they will want it. NO! They will work to destroy America because there are too many Christians here, and they must by all means, including violent means work to establish Islamic institutes and law.

Ten years from now, or sooner, we will see an Iraq more violent, more dangerous, more America-hating, more despotic than it was under the despot they hung.

8 posted on 07/18/2009 3:35:12 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
Wasn't it Patton who said that if he were caught between Nazi and Russian forces he would attack in both directions?

Iran is the real enemy of America and we need Iraq as a staging ground for the “Big One”(when,of course,we get a CinC who doesn't throw like a girl).

Perhaps the Muslims we liberated need some more liberating. Muslims are like liberals in that they crap on the men that protect them. Arm the Kurds!!!

9 posted on 07/18/2009 3:39:20 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Charlie don't surf--and neither does Obama.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson