[GodGunsGuts]

Also...

For more Creationists Answers to the DINO question, see the following links (to include a discussion of Dinos with blood vessels, blood, and various other soft tissue still intact!):

http://creation.com/dinosaur-questions-and-answers

[taxesareforever]

There goes all that peer review out the winder.

[domeika]

Doesn't matter.
If it doesn't fit in with the "mainstream", it will be classified as "OOP", Out Of Place. Unlike other sciences, where dicoveries make a difference, say like Tesla's alternating current as opposed to Edison's direct current, it has no direct impact on society, or more importantly business, so the professors, who say yay or nay to your doctorate, and who most likely have staked their reputations on their egos and their previous writings, get the final say. And, if contentious with their already published views, you won't bet getting your credentials through their department if they can help it.
Wrong or right, it is what it is, and it stinks.

[goodusername]

The teeth are not of a T-rex. The teeth are not even of a tyrannosaurus. As the original article says, it is believed to be an “ancestor” of the tyrannosaurus:

“The fossilized teeth of a carnivorous dinosaur that is believed be an ancestor of the greatest of its kind, tyrannosaurus, were found in Tamba, Hyogo Prefecture, museum officials said Saturday.”

I realize it would be too much to ask for ICR to do research on an article they are commenting on (which would help them to realize that tyrannosaurus didn’t appear at all until about 68.5 million years ago, which would make it rather difficult for them to appear at any size 110 million years ago) - but is it even too much to ask for them to at least READ the article they are commenting on?

[ColdWater]

For more Creationists Answers to the DINO question

[bert]

The various chapters of Creo Science Experts have all sent teams to examine all the T Rex teeth in all the museums of the world, but to date, have found none stamped “Made by God”