To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Anybody have any thoughts on how the Statists are going to try and disarm the law-abiding?
Taxes on ammo?
More and more regulation?
Outright banning?
Registration/Confiscation?
Any thought on how they will justify such action?
'We won so screw you?'
Terrorist attack requiring the imposition of martial law?
9 posted on
07/17/2009 7:57:44 AM PDT by
GYL2
(Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson)
To: GYL2
Anybody have any thoughts on how the Statists are going to try and disarm the law-abiding? Environmental rules to make running a gun range impossible.
Hold ammo manufacturers liable for lead in the environment.
39 posted on
07/17/2009 10:51:02 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(As a child Obama was rejected from Little League because of lack of a birth certificate.)
To: GYL2
Terrorist attack requiring the imposition of martial law?
BINGO! And with their leaked memo of just who they think the terrorists are these days, we can expect our version of the "Burning of the Reichstag" any time now by obamabots so they can blame it on us.
41 posted on
07/17/2009 11:05:58 AM PDT by
domeika
(Oh well......Who is Jim Thompson?)
To: GYL2
Anybody have any thoughts on how the Statists are going to try and disarm the law-abiding?Law-abiding gun owners are a minority in this nation. Ask a smoker what happens to a member of a minority. For that matter, ask a taxpayer. The tyranny of the majority will come down on all our heads.
76 posted on
07/19/2009 9:35:42 AM PDT by
gundog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson