Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World's cheapest car goes on sale in India
The Daily Telegraph ^ | July 17, 2009 | Phil Hazlewood

Posted on 07/17/2009 3:09:18 AM PDT by myknowledge

THE world's cheapest car, the Tata Nano, hit the streets today.

The first customer was handed the keys to the vehicle its makers hope will transform travel for millions of Indians.

The head of Tata Motors, Ratan Tata, delivered the car in person at a central Mumbai dealership. No details were immediately available about the recipient or the type of Nano being delivered. But analysts said the delivery was a positive step. If follows a land dispute which forced the company to produce the cars in eastern India, delaying its production.

"I think it's very significant," the associate editor of trade magazine Autocar Professional, Darius Lam, told AFP.

"They have been talking about delivering this car since last year and subsequently due to the problems they have had with moving the factory they have had to delay it by at least one year.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

"It really shows that now they are getting their production in hand and are able to start delivering."

(Excerpt) Read more at dailytelegraph.com.au ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automobile; india; nano; tata
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Babu

Thatz the kind of sh!t box Chairman Zero wants all of us pleebs to have to drive, if he gets his way.


41 posted on 07/17/2009 6:59:18 AM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Babu

LOL.

Would the Zero ever authorize GM to produce such automobiles, if he is a fascist?


42 posted on 07/17/2009 7:26:25 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Babu
Chairman Zero has nothing to do with this car. Its a car made for the low income consumers from the 3rd world who not so long ago couldn't afford a car and their only means of commuting was to walk, use a bicycle or fill up overcrowded buses or trains. This car is likely to revolutionize the car industry and the overall economy of India by fulfilling the need of one of the largest markets in the world.

If anything the likes of Chairman Zero actually have a problem with the fact that this car is likely to increase green house gasses and will bring economic independence and freedom of mobility to a large section of lower income population.

43 posted on 07/17/2009 7:33:26 AM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Madison; 12Gauge687
When they hear that this car just needs a down payment of $200 with $60 monthly and give a gas mileage of 48 mpg, people dissing this car will be the first to line up outside the dealership.
44 posted on 07/17/2009 7:46:05 AM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

I guess the Free Trader Globalist crowd will go gaga over the Tata (of course they like all foreign crap over American, anyway), but this car should be called the caca.

If an American company built a car like this...with American workers.....the same people who are loving the Indians would be bashing Americans

They expect to sell this little car with no suspension in the Third World? There are few good roads in the Third World, or India, for that matter. These things will be broken down on the side of the dirt road

And, you are not going to haul up to 4 people around in a air-cooled lawn mower engine car in India on hot months.

I bet the owners manual is a lot like an Indian call-center....in broken English, and not very helpful


45 posted on 07/17/2009 7:48:43 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (America First: A Globalist's Two Least Favorite Words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rookie Cookie

I commute 78 miles a day. At today’s gas prices (and they will skyrocket again at some point) - sign me up!


46 posted on 07/17/2009 8:00:20 AM PDT by Jubal Madison (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
You would want a Fair Trader Patriotic crowd going pooh-pooh with the Nano (unless poor people want a Nano). They expect to sell this little car with no suspension in the Third World? There are few good roads in the Third World, or India, for that matter. These things will be broken down on the side of the dirt road It was intended for Third World cities, where traffic is slow-moving and crowded, with no need for speeds above 100 km/h.
47 posted on 07/17/2009 8:05:58 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rookie Cookie

I’m not an idiot — I’m quite aware that Zero had nothing to do with this car. And yes, I’m quite aware that it is not loaded up with emission equip.

My point was a general one, which you missed, and was that Zero wants to eliminate SUV’s and put us all in sh!t boxes on the general order of this vehicle, perhaps with emissions equip added.


48 posted on 07/17/2009 8:17:54 AM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Babu
If Zero actually allows “sh!t boxes” like this one, emissions equipped of not, a lot of people in the US would want to buy. Instead Zero will use your tax money to have unionized American car industry make overpriced environment friendly junk for you. And honestly SUVs are junk too that we don't really need, its not like everybody in US uses an SUV to get to work everyday. Most people just need a car that is affordable, reliable, fuel efficient and makes sense to an average consumer.
49 posted on 07/17/2009 8:45:23 AM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Madison
Whats even better is that with just a set of screw drivers you can disassemble the whole car in your own garage and the parts are dirt cheap and labor charge is close to nothing.
50 posted on 07/17/2009 8:52:49 AM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rookie Cookie

We already have plenty of small sh!t boxes on the market in the US, and they are not selling particularly well. While the manufacturers can’t keep up with demand for pickups and SUV’s.

It is none of Zero’s damn business what type of vehicle any manufacturer builds, or any citizen buys. He has taken over car companies in violation of the US Constitution, and he has no Constitutional right to tell citizens what products they can or cannot buy.

You sound like a nanny state Liberal, FR n00b. I’d say welcome to FR, but with your attitude, perhaps you would fit in better over at DU. Or perhaps are you just an everyday DU troll, which we see plenty of.


51 posted on 07/17/2009 9:31:56 AM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Babu
If you actually cared to read my post I actually said the same thing about Obama messing with the car industry. You only repeated the point I made. However its seems your beef with me has more to with me not being a fan of SUV. I guess hurling adhominems come easier then discussing a point.

And honestly I care less if the SUVs are selling well or not. Its fine if they are. However thats absolutely not the case. I would appreciate if you would be so kind as to point me to any article or source of your info that says American SUVs sales have picked up ........especially against small/midsized Japanese cars. If manufacturers cant keep up with demand for pickups and SUV’s why is GM selling the hummer to the Chinese and filling for bankruptcy and why is Chrysler is selling itself to the Italian Fiat? Yeah lets see what you got.

52 posted on 07/17/2009 10:13:25 AM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Rookie Cookie

First, GM was forced to file for bankruptcy by Obama after Obama had already bailed them out with taxpayer $. GM was in trouble because union contracts (which they signed) to pay the healthcare of workers who no longer worked there were bankrupting them, plus the quality of the product they produced was not competing well overall. Chrysler is in trouble for similar reasons, and they were forced by the Zero administration to do the deal with Fiat.

In both cases, the conservative point of view is that there should have been neither bailouts of these private corporations, nor goobermint takeovers, nor gobbermint interference of any kind. If the companies couldn’t make it, let the chips fall where they may, including if that means bankruptcy. Government interference in these private matters is Fascism.

I’m not a “fan” of SUV’s. I’m a “fan” of Freedom, and limited Constitutional government. What we have now is a completely out-of-control unConstitutional nanny state government that wants to tax and regulate us into serfdom, and tell us what we can and can not buy, and where we can and cannot go.

That’s all you get. I’m not your frickin’ graduate assistant who does research per your request when you snap your fingers.

Have a nice day, n00b.


53 posted on 07/17/2009 1:01:35 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Babu
Hah that's what I thought! So much for your huffing and puffing about pickups and SUV’s. Cheap antics is all you got. If you are a fan of freedom and limited government then you shouldn't have a problem with someone wanting to buy or sell anything, even if they maybe “sh!t boxes” according to you. And like it or not GM and Chrysler had failed long before Obama sealed their fate. The chips had long fallen. At least I don't have a problem if foreign companies are coming in to fill the void. I wont be missing the GM/Chrysler pickup or SUVs so much.

You too have a good weekend n00b.

54 posted on 07/17/2009 2:21:34 PM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson