Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lonestar67
Once energy sources are competitive, the watermelon environmentalists “discover” that the energy source is dangerous.

This has happened with nuclear and hydroelectric. It will happen soon with wind if it continues to increase as a viable source.

I don't think you have to worry about wind becoming cost effective, for a very long time. Wind power has lots more problems than we are led to believe, and the "environmentalists" are already attacking it, anyway.

Solar is well on the way to becoming much more cost effective in the next few years, so it will be the next big target for criticism.

Geothermal shows great promise for 20 or so years out. I've already heard one liberal express concern about cooling the interior of the Earth.

45 posted on 07/16/2009 2:49:21 PM PDT by 3niner (When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: 3niner

Locally, my university is already trying to convince people that geothermal energy use causes earthquakes. Big headlines in Dallas paper note 2.0 richter level quakes and how people felt it and how ‘they are not sure its caused by geothermal

It is such an utter lie and yet I can see how this intellectual industry of observing microquakes will be used to destroy all access to resources under ground.

Wind is a rather large contributor to the grid in Texas. I still think coal is much better but know its all going to regulated to try to choke off capitalism.


46 posted on 07/16/2009 2:56:40 PM PDT by lonestar67 ("I love my country a lot more than I love politics," President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson