Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/16/2009 1:40:15 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: EveningStar
Of course not, wouldn't want to take weeks to push her through unlike all of bush's nominees.. I really.. its just sickening that they get away with this,,,
2 posted on 07/16/2009 1:41:45 PM PDT by Mmogamer (<This space for lease>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

RIP GOP. It was great knowing you


3 posted on 07/16/2009 1:42:17 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
Dog bites man story.

As I've been asking for weeks on end: What are we going to do after we get government-run healthcare, immigration "reform," EFCA, ENDA, hate crimes, cap-n-trade, etc.?

4 posted on 07/16/2009 1:43:18 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Gee. What’s the point of voting GOP again?


5 posted on 07/16/2009 1:43:24 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Then what good are they?


6 posted on 07/16/2009 1:43:48 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

As we all know, this was exactly what we thought it was, a nice little dog and jackazz show.

Waste of time.


7 posted on 07/16/2009 1:43:55 PM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Its not an election year and we conservatives are stupid


8 posted on 07/16/2009 1:44:07 PM PDT by GeronL (UnitedCitizen.Blogspot.Com --------- United Citizens Nation! ------------- Join Today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
the panel's ranking Republican said the GOP would not block a vote on her nomination.

Um, WHY NOT?

12 posted on 07/16/2009 1:45:44 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

why are white “republican” politicians such cowards?

If sessions had just stood up and said “I’m going to do everything in my power to try and stop the confirmation of a racist who wants to rewrite the Constitution” he would have been a new STAR in the party.

As it stands, he’s no better than Jim Jeffords


14 posted on 07/16/2009 1:47:25 PM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
Sessions was great during the hearings. The GOP can't stop the nomination, so why bother holding it up with maneuvers that everyone knows will be turned into ‘the GOP hates Hispanics’ propaganda, and which the tone-deaf and ineffectual GOP will be unable to effectively counter. It's better to go for a straight patty line vote and make our feelings about allowing this unqualified bigot onto the Supreme Court.
16 posted on 07/16/2009 1:48:02 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Someone on another thread explained that she may not be as bad as many others Obama could name. It is likely that one of the other leftie SCOTUS justices will be forced to step down before the 2010 elections; so that it is better to have let her, a relative moderate, pass through with a little Senate spanking than to risk the resentful jackboot of a more leftist re-nomination.


19 posted on 07/16/2009 1:49:08 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ( Jim Thompson for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I’m not surprised. Sessions also voted to confirm Eric Holder.


23 posted on 07/16/2009 1:50:34 PM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Sounds like it time for Alabama to Retire another senator.


27 posted on 07/16/2009 1:53:03 PM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
DO NOT SEND THE GOP ANOTHER PENNY! Why keep funding these wimpy fools. They are worthless and we need to focus on a conservative political alternative.
28 posted on 07/16/2009 1:53:56 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Sell out. Another tainted hearing.


29 posted on 07/16/2009 1:54:02 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Not the nominee worth blocking. A lib (Souter) for a lib (Sotomayor).


30 posted on 07/16/2009 1:55:07 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
Just a tacit admission that they didn't have the votes to stop her nomination. They don't even have the votes to filibuster (not that they'd have the courage to do that under any circumstances anyway).

IMO, the only possible value to dragging this inevitable confirmation out is to provide the people a teachable moment. The Republicans have decided not to do this, either.

I know I'll draw fire for this, but 0 was elected, and under the constitution he has the right to nominate who he wants for the SC, unless they are clearly unfit. Senate advice and consent was meant by the founders to determine fitness, not reject on the basis of ideological differences. That's why Dems were wrong to derail Bork, Estrada, almost derail Thomas, et. al., and it would be equally wrong for Reps, if they could, to derail Sotomayor on the same basis.

This is just replacing a lib with another lib. Doesn't change the makeup of the SC at all. Frankly, at this moment in time, Republicans have a lot more important things to do than obstruct this nomination: namely, continue to educate everyone on what kind of socialist hellhole "paradise" 0 is trying his best to turn us into ASAP. I for one would rather see them stay focused on this big picture.

32 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:04 PM PDT by Emile ("In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind" -- Louis Pasteur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

GOP leadership is looking for their gonads with both hands and a mirror and finding nothing!!! They’re eunuchs; impotent and disgusting.


34 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:44 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I thought she would probably end up getting 69 votes for confirmation, but after this nonsense from Sessions, I think the number will be closer to 89.

Is there not one conservative and patriot remaining among the Republicans in the Senate?


36 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:58 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
The disadvantage of having someone like Sotomayor on the USSC is she is so terribly stupid and could probably do harm.

At the same time she's a one-woman show for advocates of some serious USSC reform ~

Odds are good Ruthy is going to poison her morning coffee first thing though.

37 posted on 07/16/2009 1:58:22 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson