Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saying no to CIT a big gamble for Team Obama
MarketWatch ^ | Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:01pm EDT | Emily Kaiser - Analysis

Posted on 07/16/2009 1:33:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In leaving CIT Group Inc to sink or swim on its own, U.S. officials are gambling that financial markets and the economy are now strong enough to withstand the possibility a big lender collapses.

On Wednesday, ten months to the day after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers exacerbated the global credit crisis, CIT said bailout talks with the government had ended, a development which may push the 101 year old company closer to failure.

Judging from the calm reaction in credit and stock markets on Thursday, it appears investors think leaving CIT to fend for itself is a safe bet.

But the broader economic impact may be far more damaging, particularly for already struggling retailers that rely on CIT as a major source of financing.

"The company's collapse would certainly ripple through thousands of small and medium businesses that rely on CIT for trade financing and lending," Gail Dudack, chief investment strategist at Dudack Research Group, told clients.

"This raises the risk of more bankruptcies and more unemployment and would be a significant negative for an already fragile economy," she said.

Indeed, that is what makes CIT's situation particularly tricky for President Barack Obama and his economic team.

CIT probably needs about $6 billion to avoid bankruptcy, after reporting eight quarterly losses in a row, analysts said. It only has assets of about $75 billion, making it only about one tenth of the size of investment bank Lehman when the government allowed it to file for bankruptcy last September.

On the other hand CIT has about one million customers who may lose funding, including about 300,000 retailers.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cit; economy; obama; thecomingdepression

1 posted on 07/16/2009 1:33:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The Age of Zero

The destruction of a nation as we know it.

Small business owners will bear the brunt and disappear as they cut back and eventually fail.


2 posted on 07/16/2009 1:37:18 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The reason is because, as goes CIT, so go 100’s if not 1,000’s of small businesses. Soetoro wants to destroy ALL of Amrika.


3 posted on 07/16/2009 1:38:04 PM PDT by perchprism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Goldman Sachs must have ordered it. Ask Bernanke.


4 posted on 07/16/2009 1:38:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I guess they don’t owe Goldman enough.


5 posted on 07/16/2009 1:38:23 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perchprism

“Soetoro wants to destroy ALL of Amrika”

So far, he’s winning. GOP hiding in men’s room.


6 posted on 07/16/2009 1:39:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Or Goldman(now a bank) wants their business.


7 posted on 07/16/2009 1:39:52 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

they got huge volumes of credit default swaps!


8 posted on 07/16/2009 1:46:26 PM PDT by remaxagnt (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Did members of CIT's board donate to McCain and other Republicans last year?
9 posted on 07/16/2009 1:47:36 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (As a child Obama was rejected from Little League because of lack of a birth certificate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

They claim they almost completely hedged their CIT exposure.


10 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:31 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’m a shareholder and just lost 75% today, but I’m glad the government didn’t bail them out. We should have stopped a long time ago, but you need to draw the line somewhere.


11 posted on 07/16/2009 1:59:33 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson