Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"No Controlling Legal Authority" to Self Defense -- Sotomayer
AIP News.com ^ | 07/15/09 | Pascal Fervor

Posted on 07/15/2009 11:04:13 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla

I just heard a soundbite of the following question "Do you believe that an individual has the right to self defense?" and Sonia Sotomayer's response to it:

"I don't believe the court has addressed that issue.... but I could be wronnnnnnng."

Evading the question of whether or not an individual has the right to self defense calls to question her intelligence and her decency BIG TIME.

Charges are dropped based on the presumption of self defense all the time. People have been exonerated forever based on a determination of self defense. But Sotomayer, rather than simply say "Yes," the answer that God fearing human beings have been saying forever, demurred.

Let me observe that I have a right to demand that she promise not to introduce to the United States the kind of horrors visited upon our British cousins. They have been denied this basic right now for over a decade. Thus, I do not believe she was being stupid as some will claim. She is being devious.

This nomination is OVER.

Unless, of course, a majority of senators hate the innocent human beings whose inalienable right to life they have vowed to protect!


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; deathcultivation; prolife; sotomayer; supremecourt; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2009 11:04:16 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
This nomination is OVER.

That would be nice, but I doubt it.

2 posted on 07/15/2009 11:09:42 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Without the right of self defense, there is no right to life.


3 posted on 07/15/2009 11:10:05 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Has she been asked about Heller vs DC?

She already had ruled previously against the individual right to keep and bear arms, sufficient reason ALONE to keep off the courts.


4 posted on 07/15/2009 11:11:41 AM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

This is comical. Imagine this question:

Judge Sotomayer, does a US citizen have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

Sotomayer: “I don’t believe the court has addressed that issue.... but I could be wronnnnnnng.”


5 posted on 07/15/2009 11:11:44 AM PDT by RobRoy (This too will pass. But it will hurt like a you know what.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

I’ve been listening to the hearings a bit, and I have to say her intelligence, articulation and powers of logic do not impress me. I would expect more from someone about to become a Supreme Court justice.


6 posted on 07/15/2009 11:11:44 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
She says "The Right to Choose (Abortion)" is settled law.

She'll get back to you on self-defense.

7 posted on 07/15/2009 11:13:53 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

she is on a mission for the Messiah Zer0


8 posted on 07/15/2009 11:14:25 AM PDT by SF_Redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
If an individual does not have the right to self-defense, then the government cannot have the power to defend/protect anyone either. Why not? Because whatever power the government has, it gets from its individual citizens—who cannot give a power to the government they do not themselves possess.
9 posted on 07/15/2009 11:14:48 AM PDT by sourcery (Obama Lied. The Economy Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Again, thankfully, this miscreant can do no more damage than Souter.

We will be exchanging one left-wing radical troglodyte for another.

As long as Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, Alitto and Kennedy hang in there, America is safe and I hope they hang in there at least until the Obamanation abdicates.


10 posted on 07/15/2009 11:15:15 AM PDT by ZULU (God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Exactly the point. It is like the Al Gore denial that there was anything to be concerned about simply because the Supreme Court never addressed his crimes before.


11 posted on 07/15/2009 11:15:17 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Right, I am just supposed to stand there and let some SOB kill me. Not likely Judge!!!


12 posted on 07/15/2009 11:17:04 AM PDT by Roklok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Related...

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2009/07/just-words.html


13 posted on 07/15/2009 11:17:24 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Sotomayor needs to appear on one of those dance show competitions.

She is waltzing all over the place, and avoiding answers like crazy.

Didn’t trust her before Mon AM, and am trusting her less every hour.


14 posted on 07/15/2009 11:17:40 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
This nomination is OVER.

If by over you mean definitely "CONFIRMED", then I agree.
15 posted on 07/15/2009 11:18:16 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

I’ve been listening to the hearings a bit, and I have to say her intelligence, articulation and powers of logic do not impress me”

Same here.
Another thought: IS she dragging out all of her answers to take up more time and reduce the number of questions and follow-up questions from these Committees?


16 posted on 07/15/2009 11:19:07 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
Without the right of self defense, there is no right to life.

Exactly!

Let her be appointed to any court she likes, and let her rule any way she pleases, she still cannot alienate the right to life and the protection thereof which God Himself granted to man when He made us in His image.
17 posted on 07/15/2009 11:19:19 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

She reminds me of a dry drunk.


18 posted on 07/15/2009 11:19:22 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (This one is free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla; All

I have written the Republicans on the Senate Committee

http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

I think MAYBE that her answers to Arlen Specter are going to sink her. Are you listening? She’s evasive.

And I just want to b!tc#-slap her every time her modulated voice talks down to the Senators. Slows her speech and affects her voice. Gag me with a silver spoon.

Be sure to write the members of the committee. Get specific.

Someone needs to locate some of her classmates to find out if she was verbally abusive to them. Lawyers who have argued before her claim she’s a bully. She didn’t get that way overnight. She’s not only racist, but she’s sexist.


19 posted on 07/15/2009 11:20:58 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

I am in her “Profession” and I am not aware of a Federal CONSTITUTIONAL right of self defense. It’s a common law doctrine, codified in most, if not all, states. It’s also probably codified in Federal statutes. Am I wrong? The right is statutory, not constitutional. So, she might be right.


20 posted on 07/15/2009 11:22:48 AM PDT by uscabjd ( a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson