That is the point of debate around which this entire matter revolves. Obama is occupying the office, certainly, but whether or not he is qualified to do so has not been resolved to the major's satisfaction.
Should someone present evidence to the contrary then Maj Cook would be right in his actions."
I believe that is precisely what the major's attorney's intend to do, circumstantial though it may be. They are merely asking for a proverbial "day in court," in which the Obamanites present what they have to refute the allegations.
I believe that is precisely what the major's attorney's intend to do, circumstantial though it may be. They are merely asking for a proverbial "day in court," in which the Obamanites present what they have to refute the allegations
It's up to the Major to prove his orders are illegal, not Obama to prove they are. The Major has no solid proof.