Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin - walking in the footsteps of Rush Limbaugh and Gene Roddenberry?
vanity | July 13, 2009 | redpoll

Posted on 07/13/2009 1:16:10 PM PDT by redpoll

This morning I had a sudden thought about Sarah Palin’s future and party politics in general... what if Sarah is going to go solo? I was thinking about Rush establishing his own “network” when setting up his show, and how surprisingly different that was in the late 1980s, and, similarly, how the producers of “Star Trek: The Next Generation” did the same thing setting up their own “network” to broadcast their own show. I don’t mean for those examples to seem trivial; if you’re in broadcasting, you recognize how those programs and others like them at the time changed the media landscape. Before these and others like them, the networks controlled the content of the media; afterwards, individuals and programs could create their own networks.

In other words, Rush didn’t need one of the established networks to gather a nationwide audience. Perhaps Sarah, being a person trained in the media, is looking at essentially establishing her own franchise outside the established party “networks.” Those of us in Alaska know that she works as her own woman with a stated disgust of party politics, including Repubican party politics.

Talk about change. No need for a third party. Sarah would be representing herself, period. The media structure is there; the ability to gather a national audience can be done using modern technology; and it has appeal to many of us disgusted with old-fashioned party politics. On top of that, a move like this is essentially conservative in that the founders had a disdain for political parties. In the same way that the personal computer can do everything that used to take a large building with many writers, graphic artists, photographers, and editors, the modern Internet and associated functions can do everything that a political party used to do. Need to do a mass calling? Mass marketers have the software and equipment to do it; why not utilize it for political means? Rallies could be easily organized over social networks - and speeches and statements sent directly to potential voters without the "filter" of the media.

It will be interesting to see how Palin's future unfolds.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; media; palin; politicalparties
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Just a guess. If I’m right, though, you bet I’m going to claim to the be first one to come up with the idea.
1 posted on 07/13/2009 1:16:11 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redpoll

Quick...someone photoshop Sarah’s head onto Yeoman Rand...


2 posted on 07/13/2009 1:25:59 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

heck if it come through, I will gladly pat you on the back and say great idea mate!!, Even though I knew others thought of it first


3 posted on 07/13/2009 1:26:02 PM PDT by BornToBeAmerican (We the people, ..... never)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

4 posted on 07/13/2009 1:27:08 PM PDT by Bobalu (If life was fair it would be the horse's turn to ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

PING


5 posted on 07/13/2009 1:28:08 PM PDT by FlashBack ('0'bama: "Katrina on a Global Level")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

Interesting. Doable. Huge personal undertaking if true. “Tenacity” isn’t a strong enough word to describe what is required.

Not sure she can do it with a family. People that devoted to a goal/project tend to sacrifice everything else to achieve it - loved ones included. Remember Rush has _four_ failed marriages.

Possible, indeed. Hey, I follow her on Twitter ... that’s a start. Trent Reznor has the NIN iPhone app, pulling all things Nine Inch Nails together for millions. Rush achieved market penetration by _giving_away_ his show. Podcasts are influential. There are lots of us giving up on traditional media, looking for the new standard to access our preferred content.


6 posted on 07/13/2009 1:28:45 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (John Galt was exiled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BornToBeAmerican

>>>heck if it come through, I will gladly pat you on the back and say great idea mate!!, Even though I knew others thought of it first<<<

That’s a bummer. Still like her, though.


7 posted on 07/13/2009 1:29:18 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Thanks for the nice political cartoon, bub. I’m putting it in my collection.


8 posted on 07/13/2009 1:30:38 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

There have been independants that have run for President before.

Ross Perot ran as “himself” in 92. 18.9% of the vote.

John Anderson ran as “himself” in 80. 6.6% of the vote.

I don’t think any other serious candidate for President has ever run without a party affiliation.


9 posted on 07/13/2009 1:32:13 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Sarah’s hotter than yeoman Rand.

Now where’s that Saurian brandy?


10 posted on 07/13/2009 1:33:07 PM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

How about if we tint her green instead?


11 posted on 07/13/2009 1:33:53 PM PDT by Dahoser (The missus and I joined the NRA. Who says Obama can't inspire conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

You’re right. I thought about Perot right after posting this. Teddy Roosvelt essentially ran as himself, too, although he set up his own party. What they lacked was the technology to pull it off... perhaps. If Sarah does try it, she’ll be the ultimate outsider, certainly.

Thanks for the comments back.


12 posted on 07/13/2009 1:43:16 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser
I am sorry, I just do not see her as being electable as the head of a ticket, maybe as a VP but not at the top.
I did not and still do not think that Hillary could be elected, And as happened in the last election, people turned to an unknown to vote for (why we are in the trouble) before they would vote for her.
Sarah Palin, at this time is a one trick pony that is very unskilled and light. Her detractors use this against her and her supporters are not paying attention to this fact. For that matter her popularity and support seem to be along the lines of that which supported Ross Perot.
Back then you would ask a Perot support why he was supporting him and he would gladly tell you that he was an outsider and he was going to kick butt. When you ask them how he was going to do that, exactly what he was proposing to do, or what his programs were. They could not tell you. Instead you got how, he made his money and how he had rescued his employees. But they really had not paid any attention to him. He was different and that is all that mattered.
The Palin supporters remind me of them very much.
13 posted on 07/13/2009 1:49:55 PM PDT by Wooly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wooly
"Sarah Palin, at this time is a one trick pony that is very unskilled and light."

You must be living on a short leash under a cabbage!

14 posted on 07/13/2009 1:51:27 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

Perot and Rosevelt were deliberate spoilers; they were not seeking office.


15 posted on 07/13/2009 1:52:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

Rush didn’t “setup his own network.” - He was working for Roger Ailes. (does the name ring any bells?)


16 posted on 07/13/2009 1:56:18 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wooly
The New GOP loyalty song, just for you...



Oh, come on, come on, come on, come on!

Didn’t I make you feel like you were the only one - yeah!

Didn’t I give you nearly everything that a I possibly can? GOP, you know I did!
And each time I tell myself that I, well I think I’ve had enough,
But I’m gonna show you, baby, that a citizen can be tough.

I want you to come on, come on, come on, come on and take it,
Take it!
Take another little piece of my freedom, baby!
Oh, oh, break it!
Break another little bit of my heart now, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Oh, oh, have a!
Have another little piece of my life now, baby,
You know you got it if it makes you feel good,
Oh, yes indeed.

You’re out on the socialist street looking good,
And baby deep down in your heart I guess you know that it
ain’t right,
Never, never, never, never, never, never hear me when I cry,
Babe, I cry all the time!
And each time I tell myself that I, well I can’t stand the
pain,
But when you spin big government news, I’ll sing it once again.

I’ll say come on, come on, come on, come on and take it!
Take it!
Take another little piece of my freedom now, baby.
Oh, oh, break it!
Break another little bit of my life, yeah,
Oh, oh, have a! Have another little
piece of my heart now, baby,
You know you got it, commie, if it makes you feel good.

17 posted on 07/13/2009 1:58:13 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I have been a Republican forever, voting the first time for Nixon. I have a dream, and Sarah Palin is not the one that will make that dream come true.
That dream is what is left of the Democrat party sitting in a room where it's new leaders are tell Pelosi, Waxman, Schumer, Reid, BOxer, Rangel, Conyers, Murtha, and too many to name to “Set down and shut the “F” up.”
18 posted on 07/13/2009 2:23:05 PM PDT by Wooly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wooly
They will never do it, and this is why...


19 posted on 07/13/2009 2:44:18 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

bttt


20 posted on 07/13/2009 6:25:09 PM PDT by The Wizard (Democrat Party: a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson