[allmendream]

I am not asking metmom to defend anything other than HER OWN statement that ‘virtually nobody knows an actual geocentrist’ when the presence of geocentric creationists has been brought to her attention at least twice in the past, most recently about a week ago by me.

I also want to know by what criteria a geocentrists unscientific view would be excluded from consideration in science class, but her own creationist unscientific view should be included.

[AndrewC]

I am not asking metmom to defend anything other than HER OWN statement that ‘virtually nobody knows an actual geocentrist’ when the presence of geocentric creationists has been brought to her attention at least twice in the past, most recently about a week ago by me.

C'mon now. I am not stupid. Your statements here are absolutely clear.

POST 323 --- Do you find their views ridiculous or merely wrong? By what criteria would you exclude their nonscientific views from science class while including your own?

POST 329 --- So do you find their Geocentric opinion ridiculous, or just wrong? By what criteria would you exclude their unscientific views but include your own?

[metmom]

I am not asking metmom to defend anything other than HER OWN statement that ‘virtually nobody knows an actual geocentrist’ when the presence of geocentric creationists has been brought to her attention at least twice in the past, most recently about a week ago by me.

I've never been personally acquainted with a geocentrist, creationist or not.

Does what someone else accuses an anonymous internet poster of count? Not really.

Creationists are regularly accused of all kinds of ridiculous things by evos. I'm not taking the word of one anonymous internet poster on the beliefs of another anonymous internet posted and then say that I know a geocentist.