Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; AndrewC; GourmetDan; editor-surveyor
I am not asking metmom to defend anything other than HER OWN statement that ‘virtually nobody knows an actual geocentrist’ when the presence of geocentric creationists has been brought to her attention at least twice in the past, most recently about a week ago by me.

I've never been personally acquainted with a geocentrist, creationist or not.

Does what someone else accuses an anonymous internet poster of count? Not really.

Creationists are regularly accused of all kinds of ridiculous things by evos. I'm not taking the word of one anonymous internet poster on the beliefs of another anonymous internet posted and then say that I know a geocentist.

360 posted on 07/16/2009 12:34:58 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
So you refuse to acknowledge the existence and personally expressed views of the two Geocentric poster I invited to the thread?

How disrespectful. You call them straw men. Claim their views are unreasonable. Now you refuse to even acknowledge their existence.

So what about the geocentric view do you find unreasonable?

How is a geocentric creationists views philosophically different than a heliocentric creationists views?

Are some just more willing to “compromise” their scriptural interpretation in light of relevant facts?

363 posted on 07/16/2009 12:39:07 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson