I understand the argument just fine, Dreamer. The fact that you won’t state your own position only shows that you are afraid to be pinned down and defeated (again).
And I have never claimed to have refuted an entire field of study. I’m claiming that Creation and ID scientists, who have the same academic and professional credentials as your Temple of Darwin co-religionists, have completely refuted your outdated ERV arguments.
As for explaining why biologists think ERVs are evidence for common descent, you already know that I know the answer to this, as we have spent weeks on this subject in the past. Could it be that YOU have forgotten your own idiotic arguments?
As for asking what you meant by looking younger, the question still stands. I want every aspect of your argument committed to writing so that when I tear your lame, outdated Temple of Darwin arguments to shreds, your comments will be there for all to read.
And as for how stupid it makes you look, I can only assume that you were looking in the mirror, otherwise your comment makes no sense. Which makes sense, as it was you, not me, who dropped out of graduate school.
And yes, I have a Masters in Molecular Biology after defending my thesis. You have a worthless degree in Administrating administration for administrators.
If you understood the question you wouldn't have had to ask ‘what do you mean by look younger’; you would have answered the question that your so called explanation left untouched.
You made a rather grandiose claim to prior victories and have repeatedly shown both by your beginner level questions and your idiotic “explanation” that you don't even know the subject.
Of course, we totally respect your non-technical degrees but they add zero to the validity of your opinions on technical issues.