Or better yet, why don’t you explain “in your own words” why ERVs are “what many (Temple of Darwin fanatics) consider to be the ‘STONGEST’ argument for common descent...” You won’t dare do it because you know what happened last time, and it still smarts. Otherwise you would have risen to the challenge a long time ago. But if you do muster up the courage to venture an argument, do try to keep your arguments current—there’s a reason why call you Snoozer.
I complained that your idiotic source couldn't even deal with what most consider to be the strongest evidence of common descent.
Your claim was that you had already refuted this argument, although what that had to do with the author not including anything about the subject I am at a loss to explain.
Your claim was that you had already refuted this argument, and I challenged you to...
a) explain why biologists think that ERV’s are evidence of common descent.
and
b) where they are mistaken.
You have FAILED to do either, as you know less than nothing about the subject and your supposed refutation was embarrassing even for you.