Put up or shut up Gutless wonder.
You claimed to have assembled an argument that falsified an entire field of study; a field of study that you are too ignorant of to even summarize the basic precepts of.
Apparently the idiotic author of this drivel you like to post was not too impressed with this argument as he left what many consider to be the STRONGEST argument for common descent (ERV data) entirely untouched.
People are still using ERV data to construct phylogenies. By what criteria do you consider this methodology “outdated”?
What about my previous and quite thorough refutation of your lame and outdated ERV arguments do you not agree with?
Or better yet, why don’t you explain “in your own words” why ERVs are “what many (Temple of Darwin fanatics) consider to be the ‘STONGEST’ argument for common descent...” You won’t dare do it because you know what happened last time, and it still smarts. Otherwise you would have risen to the challenge a long time ago. But if you do muster up the courage to venture an argument, do try to keep your arguments current—there’s a reason why call you Snoozer.