To: Maelstorm
It's not even so much "quiet and unobtrusive". Americans have rights. If there is an injustice, it's appropriate -- and very American -- to change it.
But when gay marriage advocates take the mantel of civil rights issues, it's just too phoney, too contrived, to be believed.
19 posted on
07/11/2009 8:48:26 PM PDT by
GVnana
(Sarah for America)
To: All
Congratulations... MAINE!... we CELEBRATE WITY YOU! :)
20 posted on
07/11/2009 8:55:31 PM PDT by
ElPatriota
(The SILENCE of the Catholic Church on the war on family-values is *** DEAFENING ***)
To: GVnana
Then “quiet and unobtrusive” was a reference to the sexual activism not in general reference to politics. I agree where there is injustice let it be addressed.
21 posted on
07/11/2009 9:02:07 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(Sarah Palin 2012 (Who else in the GOP is man enough?))
To: GVnana
Americans have rights. If there is an injustice, it's appropriate -- and very American -- to change it. I might be stepping out on a limb here, but IMO Americans have already long attained all the rights (and more) they could possibly have as promised in the Constitution. All new "rights" are contrived and are really preferences meant to give a subculture Carte Blanche to engage in activity the law has deemed immoral. Sorry, but can you give me a possible "right" that some individual is currently being denied?
27 posted on
07/12/2009 4:45:01 PM PDT by
fwdude
(Be still, my soul: the waves and winds still know His voice who ruled them while He dwelt below.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson