Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House cuts funding for (Soldier) gear (Armored vests & armored vehicles)
Stars and Stripes ^ | Friday, July 10, 2009 | Leo Shane III

Posted on 07/10/2009 5:21:04 PM PDT by xzins

WASHINGTON — House lawmakers on Thursday blasted a White House decision not to provide money next fiscal year for upgrades to combat-worn equipment, and promised a fight to put billions back into the defense budget.

The House version of the fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill already contains about $20 billion for the repair of equipment worn down by desert conditions and purchase of new gear to replace items destroyed in combat. About $11 billion of the total is for the Army alone.

But that’s down more than $2 billion from previous years’ requests, and doesn’t include any funds for things like vehicle armor improvements, new communications equipment or other upgrades. Officials from the Office of Management and Budget said money for those improvements will come from the Army’s base budget, and not from the extra overseas contingency funds meant to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Chiarelli said Tuesday that the directive outlining the funding change effectively cuts any such recapitalization work next year.

"For the most part, adding on upgrades to equipment won’t be allowed in FY2010," he said. "I think it makes a lot of sense to upgrade when we can. But the new rules are that we can’t do that."

In a statement OMB officials said the move "is part of a long-overdue attempt to rationalize how the Administration requests funding for war, versus non-war programs, forces and activities."

But news of the policy upset lawmakers, who said they were unaware of any limits on equipment reset for next year and were concerned about shortchanging the services.

"If we’re going to do this on the basis of ... a budget number, as opposed to our obligation to provide what [the services] need, then I have a real dilemma here," said Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii. "I can’t say we’re giving a number that really provides for [the military’s] necessity."

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md., said OMB may have overstepped its boundaries in the directive by limiting how the reset fund can be spent, and said he believes the Army and Marine Corps should receive the money they need for critical readiness upgrades next year.

OMB officials did not provide comment by deadline, but service officials confirmed the overseas contingency operations directive was provided to the Pentagon as part of the budget process earlier this year.

Congress has authorized nearly $70 billion for reset and upgrades of equipment since 2006, money that doesn’t include funds to fast-track production of combat necessities like Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles.

Army and Marine Corps officials have said throughout that shortfalls in equipment and repair funding would not endanger troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, since they’re constantly supplied with the best-conditioned vehicles and gear available.

But units training in the States, or those in noncombat units based overseas, have been stuck with older equipment and faced shortfalls in getting up-to-date training equipment.

Chiarelli said he’s confident the $11 billion the Army requested for fiscal 2010 — about $8 billion for logistics costs and depot maintenance, and $3 billion for procurement and repair — is enough to keep missions and training operating smoothly.

"We are able with the funds available to reset equipment," he said. "We understand the tremendous fiscal crisis our country has gone through. As long as we can reset our equipment, we understand that because of fiscal requirements it may be in the best interest of our country as a whole to cut back on recapitalization."

The Marine Corps is expected to receive about $2 billion in reset funds, and the National Guard and Reserve another $7 billion.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: agenda; armor; bho44; bhowod; defensespending; democrats; hypocrisy; military; obama; refurbishment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: xzins

Prayers for your son.


81 posted on 07/10/2009 9:12:01 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

I’m with you tail.. We need a brand new Washington from the bottom up including a lot of the progressice Republicans. Our Founders meant for the government to work together for the good of the Republic not some cause or lining their own pockets


82 posted on 07/10/2009 9:23:20 PM PDT by paul revere is riding ((yelling Obama is coming Obama Is coming))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And the soldiers themselves will have to buy the armor gear for themselves out of their pockets.


83 posted on 07/10/2009 9:49:34 PM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

“Whats wrong with Obama sending our troops off to war under geared and under funded. IMPEACH.”

Ditto! Kick that trash out of White House.


84 posted on 07/10/2009 9:53:16 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

The S O B 0bama has no concept of what is to be an American.


85 posted on 07/10/2009 10:39:55 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

FUBO!!!!!!!!!!!!
AN EVIL CREATURE OF SATAN!


86 posted on 07/10/2009 10:41:21 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

0bama is putting our Troops in harm’s way.......on purpose.


87 posted on 07/10/2009 10:42:43 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: unkus

I agree, he is not on our side. He’s just doing what any good muzzie would do.


88 posted on 07/10/2009 10:46:12 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: xzins

We’re waiting to hear from you, John Kerry .............................,

the indignant John Kerry..........,

the John Kerry who in 2004 was so indignant about properly equiping our troops.

.....Sir?


89 posted on 07/10/2009 10:59:19 PM PDT by cookcounty (He who controls the Language controls the Debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

You’re right, the evil sonavabitchich is an enemy of good.


90 posted on 07/10/2009 10:59:29 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: xzins

These bastards will lie, cheat and steal....whatever it takes.


91 posted on 07/10/2009 11:01:28 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer; xzins

“Tell this to a Marine to his face!!! I dare you!!!”

Me too, I dare him!!!


92 posted on 07/11/2009 1:45:07 AM PDT by Semper Mark (Third World trickle up poverty, will lead to cascading Third World tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
Has anyone asked Obama why we are still in Afghanistan?

Read this month's article in Military History about how / why no one has ever conquered Afghanistan. Zero is a bigger idiot than we realize if he thinks he's going to prevail over those people.

93 posted on 07/11/2009 4:39:27 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Didn’t they savage the Bush Admin. for the same reasons???


94 posted on 07/11/2009 5:54:33 AM PDT by mrsixpack36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Soetoro’s military policy so far

Gays ask and tell
Fight Taliban with hands tied
Cancel F-22 and Missile Defense
Cancel Body armor and vehicle funding.
Investigate the CIA

We are less safe, Impeach him!


95 posted on 07/11/2009 6:14:34 AM PDT by omega4179 (Anti Obamaphile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

[[WASHINGTON — House lawmakers on Thursday blasted a White House decision not to provide money next fiscal year for upgrades to combat-worn equipment, and promised a fight to put billions back into the defense budget.]]

Perhaps the military should pull htemselves out of all wars and temp occupations, bring everyone back to their bases, and tell the soldiers that the administration refuses to adequately protect htem, so until Obama does, they are NOT goign ot risk their lives onem ore minute IF Obama is goign to be so reckless and careless about their lives!


96 posted on 07/11/2009 8:02:48 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

[[In this case, Obama is simply cutting funding for refurbishment and upgrades. THAT is criminally negligent with a war going on. It might be the most impeachable-worthy act in his administration to date.]]

And EVERY GOP member should be standing up and DEMANDING that impeachment proceedures be started IMMEDIATELY, but the spinelss GOP will do nothign of hte sort because they fear the wrath of the administration because after all- He’s black, He’s muslim, and he’s the annointed one that can’t be opposed! The GOP FEARS that if htey were to do such a thing, it would be seen as racist because they know full well the mainstream media would jump all over them relentlessly, claiming racism!

Obama will do as he pleases, when he pleases, and to whomever he pleases, and NOONE will oppose him because of his skin color


97 posted on 07/11/2009 8:06:31 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I remember during the early days of the Iraq war news about soldiers not having enough protection. Democrats were incensed and took that opportunity to blast Bush.

Oh, but it's OK now that the soldiers do without since their hero, Obama is in office.

98 posted on 07/11/2009 8:17:43 AM PDT by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer
I joked the other day that Obama was going to turn swords into ploughshares. Next day that thread was posted.

I'm not going to joke anymore.

99 posted on 07/11/2009 8:24:42 AM PDT by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
This from the same party that campaigned on the alleged Republican failure to provide body armor and up-armored personnel carriers?

Yeah, but that was back during President Bush's Administration when we HAD THE MONEY.

Now the money is being diverted to more socialist causes that benefit those who were griping. They don't want to look a gift horse in the mouth.

100 posted on 07/11/2009 9:15:54 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson