I was wondering about that too and I haven't seen an answer. I know at least one person was zotted on the thread talking about the article. I saw "post deleted", then that person wrote "I should have proofed that before I posted" and then zotted. It apparently was a repeat of the post they had put on the original thread, for all I know, could have been the poster of the thread. I'm sure that's being looked into. Newbie of course.
It was a setup.
Could have been, and we should be on guard for more.
The objective of the Obamites is not to defeat us in open debate, or even the skewed nonsense they feel is "fair", but to silence us.
Recall Obama won his first nomination by eliminating any dissenting voices. To debate us lets our opinion, no matter how often and vociferously reviled by the Obamites, get into the public eye, and thus, become food for thought for the masses.
They want to avoid it at all costs.
If we are to keep a place at the table, that might mean keeping our remarks well worded enough to express many of the same opinions without providing the enemy a sound byte to sieze upon.
For all practical purposes, the tasteless mode of dress of the Presidential entourage can be pointed out without making any comment the enemy can call "racist", heck, it is self-evident.
So we can attack the substance of their acts without presenting an opening for riposte for saying anything we might not say about anyone who behaved similarly, without the unnecessary references which weaken (in the eyes of the multitude) our point.