Posted on 07/10/2009 6:37:37 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
It looks like we might finally have to put a picture of Randi Rhodes on milk cartons. Last April, your humble correspondent declared that such milk carton photos of Randi would be unnecessary because, despite being MIA since February when she left Nova M Radio, Premiere Radio Networks would begin broadcasting her show again in May. Well, a couple of months have gone by and, oddly, Randi seems to be even more hidden from public view than when she wasn't on the air. Even Google searches have proved fruitless. Yes, I know Randi is on the air (or so it is rumored) but her impact is somewhere between nil and none. If Randi has a publicity director, he/she must be doing worst job imaginable.
Therefore it looks like it is up to me to once again bring a little public notice to Randi. Why am I being so charitable to that leftwing talk show host? As I explained in April, it is because I feel something of a proprietary interest in Randi since Yours Truly played a part in launching her onto the national stage by prominently mentioning her in a movie review of "The Italian Job" in 2003 when she was still stuck on a local radio station in West Palm Beach.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
PING!
She likely won’t put it on the air because she’s complicit in it as well. It’s all likely about the looting of the charity funds used to prop up AA.
Randy Rhodes concerning Frankenstein: “I know some stuff. I choose not to put it on the air. “
How magnanimous of her.
If it were a fourth-hand rumor about Sarah Palin from an obscure person who saw Sarah for 2 minutes from half a mile away, Rhodes would have broadcast it relentlessly, repeatedly, and ruthlessly.
Give me a break.
She’s only trying to draw attention to herself.
Not that there probably isn’t VOLUMES of incriminating stuff about Al Franken, but Rhodes will NEVER disclose it.
Two reasons.
1. She’s a pie-eyed Leftist
2. Franken would punch her lights out and sue her blind.
...
RHODES (34:52): The reasons that I have for thinking he (Franken) will make a terrible Senator are really valid. I’ve kept them to myself. I’ve not put them on the air. I let the man run without the burden of what I know, which is all documentable and researchable and you can find it on the Internet. Never said a word. Left it to the voters in Minnesota to find out. Left it to Norm Coleman to expose it if he did some background operational research he could have found a lot of stuff. Didn’t bother to do it.
On the other hand, I’ve got plenty of reasons to believe that Al Franken is not going to be the type of honest senator, the kind of transparent operator that were were voting for. The kind of transparency and accountability that we voted for, he doesn’t fit that mold. I know some stuff. I choose not to put it on the air.
...
RHODES (34:52): The reasons that I have for thinking he (Franken) will make a terrible Senator are really valid. I’ve kept them to myself. I’ve not put them on the air. I let the man run without the burden of what I know, which is all documentable and researchable and you can find it on the Internet. Never said a word. Left it to the voters in Minnesota to find out. Left it to Norm Coleman to expose it if he did some background operational research he could have found a lot of stuff. Didn’t bother to do it.
On the other hand, I’ve got plenty of reasons to believe that Al Franken is not going to be the type of honest senator, the kind of transparent operator that were were voting for. The kind of transparency and accountability that we voted for, he doesn’t fit that mold. I know some stuff. I choose not to put it on the air.
Regarding your two reasons: 1. She’s a pie-eyed Leftist 2. Franken would punch her lights out and sue her blind. >1. Correct, but she is also a bitter, drunken, econut feminist lezzie commie. But I repeat myself. >2. Franken couldn’t punch his was out of Depends. But his controllers (Axelrod and Emmanuel) would send a hit squad after her, but she would only fall down a flight of stairs. >3. She is hoping for some hush money. A new radio show featuring government PSAs, a bloated book deal slamming the right, a university endowment. She will take any and all when she is busted.
She's basically saying, I'll keep them to myself unless I get a TON OF MONEY. Money and emotion drive the Progressive-Liberals.
And almost as well hidden from the public as when she was on Air America...
Randi: If you hire me, I MIGHT talk about it. But I want all my money up front.
Apparently, there's nothing charming about Al's amatory techniques. Yes, the Rino Coleman could have dug it up. Yes, it will eventually surface. Will it make a difference? Not likely. It might if he were a Republican. Those involved with Democrats are not "victims." Rather they have been selected to benefit from a unique opportunity for personal growth.
One of the many advantages of voter fraud is that the dead, and multiple absentees are not issue-oriented and tend to ignore personal stuff about their candidates..
So pathetic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.