Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Read the Fine Print (Oliver North)
Creators Syndicate ^ | July 10, 2009 | Oliver North

Posted on 07/09/2009 9:10:39 PM PDT by jazusamo

WASHINGTON — The glow is off the rose. The euphoria is gone. The thrilled, awe-inspired crowds are no longer there. No, that's not a reflection on the recent Michael Jackson media madness. Instead, it's a summary of the Obama family outing to Russia, Italy and Africa. Other than a week's respite from the deepening U.S. financial crisis, the collapse of constitutional government in Honduras, and staged photo ops, the trip yielded little to give the American people hope that the O-Team comprehends the dangers we face in this world — or what to do about them.

The trip to Chad and the G-8 summit in L'Aquila, Italy, produced no serious risks to our future — other than the snapshot of Mr. Obama shaking hands with Libya's colorfully clad Moammar Gadhafi, the usual Euro-pablum about global warming's (now re-branded as "climate change") being "the greatest threat to mankind," and empty promises to do more about peacekeeping in Africa. The real damage was done earlier, in Moscow.

According to White House officials busily briefing on what this week's trip was supposed to achieve, Iran was "front and center" on our president's agenda. But the Russians dismissed the recent "unpleasantness" in Iran and the thought of any action against the theocrats in Tehran before Mr. Obama even arrived in Moscow. As Air Force One headed east, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev, dutifully following Vladimir Putin's well-honed lead, said: "If I understand correctly, the United States would like to establish more open and more direct relations with Iran. We support this choice. It would be counterproductive to resort to other sanctions." The O-Team describes this as pragmatism. So much for human rights in Persia.

The O-Team also sought to enlist Russian help in pressuring Iran and North Korea to abandon efforts to develop nuclear weapons and the means of delivering them. About the best they got was an acknowledgment from Medvedev: "We should make our utmost (effort) to prevent any negative trends there." To reassure the dubious, he added, "We share the same attitude toward this problem."

Whether the patently naive Mr. Obama believes this falsehood is unknown. We can only hope that those accompanying our commander in chief know better. In February, Moscow's nuclear technicians helped their Iranian counterparts turn on the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant. Despite American overtures to the contrary, the facility still is scheduled to come fully on line — and therefore generate not only electricity but also plutonium that can be used in nuclear weapons — before the end of the year.

After spending nearly a full day with Medvedev, Mr. Obama sat down to a two-hour breakfast with the real power in Moscow, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Though Putin said afterward, "With you, we link all our hopes for the furtherance of relations between our two countries," there is little to show for such platitudes.

Just to make sure everyone knows who is calling the shots in the Kremlin, while Obama and Putin were sitting down to swap stories over caviar, Kyrgyzstan's president, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, did Moscow's bidding and signed a new lease for the U.S.-built air base at Manas. In February, Bakiyev announced that the base, a crucial logistics hub for U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, would be closed this summer. The only change: a price hike, from $17 million to $60 million, in annual rent. The Russians also announced that U.S. combat troops and supplies now can transit Russian territory to get in and out of Afghanistan. What Mr. Obama had to give away to get these deals hasn't been announced.

The bottom line is that Russia will continue selling S-300s — the most advanced air-defense weapons in the world — to Iran. The Russians will not agree to any stringent intervention that might prevent Tehran and Pyongyang from acquiring deliverable nuclear weapons. Worst of all, the "joint understanding" on reducing Russian and U.S. nuclear arsenals, which Obama and Medvedev signed with such a flourish Monday, is being interpreted differently already in both Moscow and Washington.

According to the O-Team, they made it "crystal clear" to the Russians "right from the beginning" that there "is no linkage" between a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the construction of U.S.-NATO ballistic missile defense systems in the Czech Republic and Poland. But shortly after they inked the deal, Medvedev observed: "The joint understanding, which has just been signed, declares the link between offensive and defensive armaments. This is a step forward. A short time ago, we had nothing but disagreements. Now we confirm this link, which enables us to bring our positions closer together." In short, somebody isn't telling the truth.

Like so much else in the Obama administration — whether it is a bank bailout, an "economic stimulus," health care reform or a tax hike — the devils are in the details. Sure hope someone who cares is reading the fine print.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: iran; medvedev; obama; olivernorth; putin; russia

1 posted on 07/09/2009 9:10:39 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2rightsleftcoast; abner; ACAC; advertising guy; Arkinsaw; athelass; aumrl; basil; bboop; BAW; ...
OLIVER NORTH PING!

Photobucket

Please Freepmail me to be added to the Ollie North ping list.

2 posted on 07/09/2009 9:12:09 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Looks like it is going to be up to the odd couple of Saudi Arabia and Israel to take care of the Iran menace.


3 posted on 07/09/2009 9:12:38 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Please bump the Freepathon and donate if you haven’t done so!

4 posted on 07/09/2009 9:12:55 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

You just may be right, Zer0 isn’t going to lift a finger.


5 posted on 07/09/2009 9:16:52 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

North for President

Semper Fi


6 posted on 07/09/2009 9:32:33 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks for the ping jaz. If somebody would send me the fine print, I care enough to read it.


7 posted on 07/09/2009 9:38:07 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
North and John Bolton--what a dream pair.

vaudine

8 posted on 07/09/2009 9:41:51 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

North is right on the money once again. In time Obama will be seen as the phony he is.


9 posted on 07/09/2009 10:13:17 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

[The Russians also announced that U.S. combat troops and supplies now can transit Russian territory to get in and out of Afghanistan.]

This gives the Russians leverage because they can threaten to choke off this pipeline when it suits them. It is likely to become a road with an expensive toll. The power structure of the new Russia is a mafia family with a national flag.


10 posted on 07/09/2009 10:21:36 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Exactly, I can’t see anything good coming from this. Don’t know if O and his team is just naive or if they know exactly what they’re doing and don’t care. I doubt there’s any former recent president that would have done this, maybe Carter.


11 posted on 07/09/2009 10:26:55 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I think the White House is so desperate to legitimize its foreign policy that it will risk national security for the temporary illusion of progress. As North pointed out, the administration is totally spinning the talks. Medvedev observed: “The joint understanding, which has just been signed, declares the link between offensive and defensive armaments. . .” Obama claimed there was no linkage. The Russians want a new Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty because they can't compete in an SDI arena. If the U.S. and NATO are willing to spend the money on ABM’s they can come close to neutralizing Russia's strategic nuclear force. Reagan's rearmament of Western Europe and his mostly smoke-and-mirrors “Star Wars” threat frightened and demoralized Gorbachev—for a change—into an epiphany.

The U.S. nuclear arsenal is well-maintained but the bulk of the warheads is aging. The tooling no longer exists to re-fabricate many of the original components. A long debate has been going on over the reliability of rehabilitated warheads. Because these will contain “aftermarket” components there is a chance they could malfunction. There are computer models for testing these weapons but some of the engineers and physicists are convinced that only an actual test will answer the question. This requires violating the Test Ban Treaty. There is also a design for the next generation of warheads—costing a few hundred billion to develop and produce. One or two of these would have to be tested.

Obama doesn't want to even deal with this because it boggles his mind. Instead he wants a “Nuclear Free World.” He might as well wish for a newspaper containing only good news.

12 posted on 07/09/2009 11:31:10 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

*snort* The O-Team!


13 posted on 07/10/2009 9:15:15 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Bush Deserves More Credit on Iran
WSJournal | July 11, 2009 | JOHN P. HANNAH
Posted on 07/10/2009 6:29:02 PM PDT by don-o
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2290112/posts


14 posted on 07/10/2009 7:52:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson