Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Sarah Palin (Record in office has not been as conservative as she is personally)
Powerline ^ | 7/9/2009 | John Hindraker

Posted on 07/09/2009 8:13:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

I haven't commented on Sarah Palin's resignation as Governor of Alaska since Friday afternoon, when I noted the story and said that her resignation "seems bizarre to me." Here are some additional thoughts on the subject.

I am, to begin with, an admirer of Governor Palin--the real Sarah Palin, not the creature of myth. Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the Palin phenomenon is that the mythical version, a caricature of Palin as arch-conservative, especially on the social issues, and populist almost to the point of know-nothingism, has been embraced by many of her supporters as avidly as by her enemies.

But the caricature has little to do with Palin's actual record as a public servant. I don't doubt that she is, personally, a conservative, but her record in office has not been particularly conservative and her political career owes little or nothing to the social issues. She represents, rather, an older strand of Republicanism--the reformist, good-government variety.

Given that Palin is now viewed almost exclusively as symbol, it is not surprising that the least-remarked portion of her resignation speech was that in which she recounted her administration's achievements. But those accomplishments are, in fact, considerable:

Here's some of the things we've done:

We created a petroleum integrity office to oversee safe development. We held the line for Alaskans on Point Thomson - and finally for the first time in decades - they're drilling for oil and gas.

We have AGIA, the gasline project - a massive bi-partisan victory (the vote was 58 to 1!) - also succeeding as intended - protecting Alaskans as our clean natural gas will flow to energize us, and America, through a competitive, pro-private sector project. This is the largest private sector energy project, ever. This is energy independence.

And ACES - another bipartisan effort - is working as intended and industry is publicly acknowledging its success. Our new oil and gas "clear and equitable formula" is so Alaskans will no longer be taken advantage of. ACES incentivizes new exploration and development and jobs that were previously not going to happen with a monopolized North Slope oil basin.

We cleaned up previously accepted unethical actions; we ushered in bi-partisan Ethics Reform.

We also slowed the rate of government growth, we worked with the Legislature to save billions of dollars for the future, and I made no lobbyist friends with my hundreds of millions of dollars in budget vetoes... but living beyond our means today is irresponsible for tomorrow.

We took government out of the dairy business and put it back into private-sector hands - where it should be.

We provided unprecedented support for education initiatives, and with the right leadership, finally filled long-vacant public safety positions. We built a sub-Cabinet on Climate Change and took heat from Outside special interests for our biologically-sound wildlife management for abundance.

We broke ground on the new prison.

And we made common sense conservative choices to eliminate personal luxuries like the jet, the chef, the junkets... the entourage.

And the Lt. Governor and I said "no" to our pay raises.

A solid record of achievement in only 2 1/2 years? Absolutely. Red meat for populist conservatives? Not especially.

So I have high regard for Sarah Palin, the effective, good-government reformer. But that brings us to Palin's press conference and her resignation. The biggest problem with her press conference was that her stated reasons for resigning her office didn't make much sense.

She referred to the abuse that she and her family have taken from liberals in the press and elsewhere. No doubt about it: the liberal assault on Palin and her family has been the most despicable I've ever seen. If she had announced that she is leaving politics to return to private life, no one could have blamed her. But that isn't what she is doing; she is resigning as Governor but, evidently, running for President. So the attacks will continue and likely intensify.

She said that she didn't want to continue as a lame-duck governor. But the only reason she was a lame duck is that she had just announced she wasn't running for a second term. If she didn't want to be a lame duck, all she had to do was not hold the press conference.

Recognizing that these themes didn't account for her decision, Palin went on to explain that her real reason for resigning is that she and her office have been fatally distracted by the frivolous ethics complaints that the Democratic Party has mounted against her. She said that most of her time, and her staff's time, is now spent defending against such complaints--successfully, as every one so far has been dismissed. Most of them have been obviously stupid.

So Palin said she was resigning for the good of Alaska, since her successor will be free of this burden. Plus, she has run up a $500,000 legal bill in defending against the Democratic Party's silly charges.

This explanation has a great deal of appeal, but I don't think it holds together. Does Palin really want to set a precedent that a Republican who is unfairly attacked by Democrats will quit? If that principle were followed, the Republican Party would quickly become extinct.

Actually, the Democrats' frivolous ethics charges represent an opportunity. Alaska is a Republican-leaning state. If Palin were to push back against the Democrats--locally, not nationally--she could make them pay a price for their indefensible tactic, and likely cause them to back off. As for the $500,000, that is a minimal amount for a politician of Palin's stature to raise by setting up a defense committee. Donors would quickly furnish a war chest. On a worst-case scenario, Todd Palin could sign a book contract tomorrow for a $500,000 advance. The facts just don't support the idea that quitting as governor is a reasonable response to the Democrats' vicious but entirely unsuccessful ethics-complaint strategy.

Here is why I think Palin quit: she wants to be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2012. No surprise there, she currently has more support than any other contender in the polls. But she has a serious problem. Her rivals for the nomination are beginning to make the circuit of Republican and conservative grass-roots groups. They are able to criss-cross the country, building up support, establishing campaign committees, speaking to Republican groups on an informal basis, supporting other Republican candidates, laying the foundation for a 2012 run.

Palin, on the other hand, is isolated in Anchorage. It takes longer to get to and from Alaska than most people realize. Palin can't zip into Chicago, deliver a speech to a Republican conference and be back in her office in time to sign a bill. If she starts spending 75 percent of her time in the lower 48, she might in fact be able to carry out her gubernatorial duties via Blackberry, but she would be crucified for abandoning the state of Alaska in favor of her national ambitions. So she resigned, in order to free up her time to campaign for the 2012 Republican nomination.

That is, I think, the only explanation that fits the facts. I still think Palin's resignation was a mistake; it will make the logistics of campaigning much easier, but her failure to complete the only major government job to which she has been elected will haunt her.

What is most sad about this, in my opinion, is that Palin herself seems willing to play the role of the symbol she has become, no matter how at odds it may be with her actual record. I doubt that the old, pre-August 2008 Sarah Palin--the real Sarah Palin, in my book--would have quit.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: belongsinbloggers; conservative; hindraker; notnews; palin; palinrecord; palinresignation; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-149 next last
To: SeekAndFind
It's gotten to the point where I now research the author/authors before reading the article. From Powerlines about us page: John H. Hinderaker is a lawyer with a nationwide litigation practice. For fifteen years Hinderaker has written with his former law partner Scott Johnson on public policy issues including income inequality, income taxes, campaign finance reform, affirmative action, welfare reform, and race in the criminal justice system. Both Hinderaker and Johnson are fellows of the Claremont Institute. Their articles have appeared in National Review, The American Enterprise, American Experiment Quarterly, and newspapers from Florida to California. The Claremont Institute has archived many of their articles here. ____________________________________________________________ As they reveal themselves it is disenheartening to find where they have found political homes in supposedly conservative organizations.
61 posted on 07/09/2009 9:21:16 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin

The only way that Sarah Palin does not get out of the primaries is if she loses to Romney. And the only way Romney can win is if:

1)Huckabee enters the Presidential sweepstakes and

2)takes away enough conservative/evangelical voters for Palin so Mitt can come up the middle in several states

NB:If Huckabee doesn’t run Palin has a clear view to the finish line because Sarah will always do better with thebase than Romney.

NB:The only way Huckabee can win the primary is if Palin does not enter the fray. If she does it is game over for him.


62 posted on 07/09/2009 9:21:19 PM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: techno

The neverending campaign which will undoubtedly start up again in late 2010 will provide WAY more than enough time to get everything together. In this way it’s like she’s out of the gate almost way too early.

If she is being bankrupted one needs to ask why? What mistakes are they making to allow them to get bankrupted? If she is being attacked as governor she shouldn’t pay for it the office should.


63 posted on 07/09/2009 9:21:35 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, Pawlenty isn’t paying anyone. BUT! Powerline is pro-Pawlenty. Same state and they are invested in his political future. They’ve been down on Palin since McCain was choosing from his short list and bypassed Pawlenty in favor of her.


64 posted on 07/09/2009 9:21:50 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GregH

Does DU pay you by the word or insult?


65 posted on 07/09/2009 9:22:05 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GregH

75% is among Republicans.


66 posted on 07/09/2009 9:22:22 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

LMAO!

You have run out of arguments and resorted to paranoia and petty attacks.

Do you a link to poll with 75% approval rating for Palin.
Put up or shut up.


67 posted on 07/09/2009 9:23:31 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"You can’t use PAC money to defend yourself from ethics charges. She would have really been in trouble if she tried that!!"

That is correct. Alaska, like every other state in the union, doesn't allow campaign funds to be used to defend ethics or criminals complaints of the candidate, usually. That's why legal defense funds are established. Under Alaska law, legal defense funds are permissible. And, the restrictions that are placed on them with respect to fund raising are not much different than restrictions that are seen in any other state. In fact, there really isn't any oversight of legal defense funds by any Alaska government agency, other than the fact that donations reaching a certain threshold have to be declared and reported. That's it.

And to be clear, since June, Palin has had at least two separate funds established on her behalf. As to how much is in those funds is anyone's guess. The Palin camp has said, nor are they required by statute to do so.

68 posted on 07/09/2009 9:23:37 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GregH
hussein himself destroyed your line of reasoning... get with it... we are now in the 21st Century and all of your points have been made moot by a pos street thug... a community organizer that never accomplished anything definitive in his entire life... a corrupt gansta with ties to organized crime figures and real estate holdings... with NO PAST RECORD other than a marxist/sharia upbringing and a black liberation theology religion... and a best friend that is a terrorist... and there is a 99% chance he was NEVER qualified to even run for office... therefore you must develop attacks against Palin that do not concern themselves with points so easily dismissed in these times.

LLS

69 posted on 07/09/2009 9:24:48 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Perception is everything in this game. Obama may have only been senator for 2, 3, or 4 years (however you want to chop it up) but he didn’t resign did he?

Yep and you are pretty much right. He had jack for experience. Except he IS president NOW. You don’t get any more experience for president than by holding the office of president.


70 posted on 07/09/2009 9:25:30 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: yongin

I think you are wrong there - she is running. This article brought some of that into focus for me. But personally I don’t think she will win the primary either.


71 posted on 07/09/2009 9:26:54 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Well he will not be able to use his time as president to campaign on if his results do not change direction 180 degrees... and helen thomas will win Miss America's title before than will happen.

LLS

72 posted on 07/09/2009 9:27:33 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This seems to be a nothing story listing some of the very things that we conservatives like about Sarah. She was a reformer and non nonsense Governor. I really like this hit pieces on Palin that are run by “friends”. I’d certainly never write such slippery piece about someone I admired.


73 posted on 07/09/2009 9:28:47 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Sarah Palin 2012 (Who else in the GOP is man enough?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregH

Pawlenty, Romney, Huck, and the other WannaBees would have to rent crowds to people to show up at their rallys.

Romeny can’t decide where he wants to live. First Mich. then Mass. with N.H. and Utah now he lives 10 miles from me in San Diego.

None of the above are CIC material


74 posted on 07/09/2009 9:30:41 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: GregH

Rasmussen has Palin at about 75% among Republicans as of 2 or 3 days ago.


75 posted on 07/09/2009 9:32:21 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Being in that position longer doesn’t make you experienced especially when you are making the wrong decisions.

Lincoln knew jack about the military but he had to fire, move, tell off, etc. his West Point Generals, most who did’t have a clue except for Grant and Sherman


76 posted on 07/09/2009 9:36:30 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

According to you none of the above are CIC material. Yet don’t look now: Obama is CIC.


77 posted on 07/09/2009 9:36:40 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Is this the poll. Seventy-six percent (76%) of Republican voters have a favorable opinion of Palin, even after her decision to resign as governor of Alaska, with 45% whose view of her is very favorable. Palin trails Huckabee, who unsuccessfully sought the Republican presidential nomination in 2008. Huckabee is favored by 78%, with 41% who feel very favorably toward him. Twenty-one percent (21%) have an unfavorable view of Palin , with nine percent (9%) very unfavorable. For Huckabee, unfavorables are 17%, including five percent (5%) very unfavorable. Romney, another unsuccessful 2008 contender, follows closely after Huckabee and Palin. Seventy-three percent (73%) view the former Massachusetts governor favorably, including 39% very favorable. Nineteen percent (19%) have an unfavorable opinion of Romney, with five percent (5%) very unfavorable.


Interestingly Palin's favourable and unfavourable are higher than Romney.
78 posted on 07/09/2009 9:36:53 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GregH

“Monthly national PPP surveys looking at the 2012 contest for President have consistently found Palin as the most popular of the likely Republican candidates with Republican voters. Around 75% of them have a positive opinion of her, ranking her above Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Newt Gingrich every time we’ve polled it.”

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2009/07/palin-bid-long-shot.html

Keep laughing, we’re reloading.

- JP


79 posted on 07/09/2009 9:38:07 PM PDT by Josh Painter ("The trouble with Socialism is... you run out of other people's money." - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Yeah Obama’s win has basically destroyed any sort of arguments who is and who is not qualified to run.

If Obama can be President, then any one can be.


80 posted on 07/09/2009 9:38:36 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson