[Not A Snowbird]

Individual pharmacists were given a limited way around selling Plan B: passing the sale to another employee in the same store, provided the patient’s order was filled without delay.

Seems fair.

[Sir Hailstone]

Once Again the Nutty Ninth strikes again.

[Repeal 16-17]

The unanimous ruling, from a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, sends the politically thorny case back to U.S. District Court to an en banc panel or SCOTUS for further review.

Fixed.

[mware]

Fr. Groschel said just a few weeks ago, that we are in the persecution, not a persecution but THE persecution.

I am beginning to believe him.

[llevrok]

WA Ping

[shteebo]

Obviously the pharmacy should not have to sell anything they don’t care to (why is this in court?), but if that’s the wacky law, you’d think they could...

(a) never have it in stock forcing customer to special order.

(b) not promise anything but very long wait for special order to be delivered.

(c) charge an outrageous mark-up on the item.

I mean, come on, you can’t force a business to provide good service on a non-monopoly product. The consumer’s obvious remedy is to go somewhere else.

[Robwin]

I found several websites where one can purchase Plan B online.

Why, then, do the Apostles of Death feel it necessary to force others to violate their conscience? How much more morally depraved must we become before Heavenly Father exercises justice on a wayward and selfish people?