Obviously the pharmacy should not have to sell anything they don’t care to (why is this in court?), but if that’s the wacky law, you’d think they could...
(a) never have it in stock forcing customer to special order.
(b) not promise anything but very long wait for special order to be delivered.
(c) charge an outrageous mark-up on the item.
I mean, come on, you can’t force a business to provide good service on a non-monopoly product. The consumer’s obvious remedy is to go somewhere else.
The purpose was primarily to force confrontation, not to get scripts filled. Your very reasonable alternatives only apply to honest folks not to democrat party dead-soul constitutents.