Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/09/2009 3:05:33 PM PDT by james.richardson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: james.richardson

Where’s mine ?


2 posted on 07/09/2009 3:07:14 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson

It never cease to amaze, does it? The incompetence and corruption is staggering.


3 posted on 07/09/2009 3:16:26 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson

It seems that in each and every gvt expenditure, no one actually “does the math”.

Recently I saw that something like $1.5 mil was dedicated to installing a fence on a bridge over an interstate around here (N.E Ohio).

Small potatoes, right? Think aobut that. That bridge is probably no more than a 1000 ft long.

If you do both sides (i.e. 2000 ft) that means the fence costs $750 per foot.

No one thinks anynmore.


6 posted on 07/09/2009 3:17:23 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson

8 posted on 07/09/2009 3:21:52 PM PDT by paulycy (Liberal DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson
Nope, definately nothing ethical or morally wrong with receiving $18 million to redo a website.... How the frakin hell do you justify or even remotely spend $18 million on a website anyhow? I can still remember the debacle over $20000 toilet seats and $4000 hammers, etc., but this is just beyond atypical retarded! No doubt, one should be proud......
10 posted on 07/09/2009 3:55:52 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson
Man they are troweling it down thick.
14 posted on 07/09/2009 4:38:50 PM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson
this is the same guy that spent $750 million to get elected president, and can't seem to even imagine a program that costs less than a trillion dollars. all things considered, we got off cheap on the website.
15 posted on 07/09/2009 5:04:51 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://www.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson
I'll do it for half that.

No. Wait. I refuse to do government work.

*Theoretically* I'd do it for half that, if the client was a private sector prospect.


A verbis ad verbera

16 posted on 07/09/2009 5:33:41 PM PDT by Costumed Vigilante (Congress: When a handful of evil morons just isn't enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson

I look forward to seeing what $18 million buys the government — I know what I could do with a fraction of that.


22 posted on 07/09/2009 6:08:52 PM PDT by Naspino (Not creative enough to have a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson
"The site is the tip of the iceberg for the effort that will go into taking spending tracking and accountability to the next level."

The $18MM site redesign is the tip of the iceberg of the level of corruption, fraud and waste of tax payer $$$'s. Chump change!

How on earth does the redesign of the Porkulus I website cost $18 million?? LMAO...They can start with tracking and accounting for the wasted $18 mil to redesign a frickin website. The corruption, fraud and outright theft of taxpayer's dollars is just revolting. PIGS!

24 posted on 07/09/2009 6:21:48 PM PDT by kara2008 (Government cannot be the solution when government is the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson

Oh boy. This is good ad material.


27 posted on 07/09/2009 8:22:41 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
...the Obama Administration awarded a 5 year $18 million contract to Smartronix, a Maryland-based IT firm with connections to House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, for the redesign of Recovery.gov. Launched in February to track the expenditures of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009... the administration has failed to deliver on two pledges central to the Obama campaign's rhetoric: fiscal responsibility and unrivaled transparency... FedSpending.org, launched in October 2006 with a meager three-year $334,272 grant from the Sunlight Foundation, is a voluminous online database of all federal grants and contracts. And, unlike Recovery.gov, the website monitors the entire federal budget, and does so at a fraction of the projected cost of Recovery.gov. Of course, the revelation that the private sector outperforms the federal government is not new. Recovery.org, a project of Onvia, monitors the flow of recovery funds from the federal government to private businesses in real-time, unlike its overpriced government counterpart which reports spending 100 days after-the-fact, thereby enabling wasteful or fraudulent spending.

28 posted on 07/09/2009 8:37:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james.richardson

What an elitist pig.

I agree with what Newt said. They think if they appoint a czar/make a web page the task is done. Obama needs impeached for many reasons but ONE is that he is not qualified.


36 posted on 07/10/2009 6:20:23 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson