1 posted on
07/09/2009 2:50:40 PM PDT by
ikez78
To: Torie; Rameumptom; mnehrling; SJackson; weegee; texanyankee; 1035rep; roses of sharon; ...
PING on Saddam-al Qaeda links
2 posted on
07/09/2009 2:52:23 PM PDT by
ikez78
(http://www.regimeofterror.com - Saddam Hussein and terrorism)
To: LucyT; autumnraine; The Sons of Liberty; Shady Ray; editor-surveyor; TexasRepublic; ScottinVA; ...
Another you won't want to miss ... PING))))))
4 posted on
07/09/2009 3:24:28 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: ikez78
There really seems to be nothing “new” here,or much beyond what was in the Army’s institute report: something on the order of “parallel play”, with Iraq footing the bill for terrorist activities.
Some of the translated documents I looked at seemed to indicate funds were being “disguised” as appropriations for “approved” projects : the giveaway being grotesque over-funding.
To: ikez78
Excellent article Mark.
I was browsing today "al falojah" terrorist forum, the largest terrorist forum on the internet and they published a document by an Al Qaeda terrorist detailing his travel from Saudi Arabia to Iraq before the war to fight against our US troops. He said that he joined the camp of "Arab Moujahdeen" which was the group of islamic non Iraqi terrorists set by Saddam regime before the war to fight our US troops.
This Saudi terrorist story matches some Saddam regime captured documents where they set up terrorist training camps for what they called "Arab Moujahdeen" to fight our US troops. The translations of these documents were published on Free Republic.
7 posted on
07/09/2009 3:31:04 PM PDT by
jveritas
(God Bless our brave troops)
To: ikez78
8 posted on
07/09/2009 3:31:43 PM PDT by
Beckwith
(A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
To: PhiKapMom
To: ikez78
To: ikez78
The proof of OBL and Saddam/Son's relationship is the l990’s reports in the NYT and ABC News on those two hooking up and planning something. (and imploring Clinton to go in)
AND in Newsweak’s special 9/11 edition...an interview with a Dem Senator, Chairman of the Senate Intel committee, talking about the intell they had on Saddam's plans.
Of course, when it was convenient, the Dems/MSM played defense for Saddam, and suddenly decided GWB was the criminal.
19 posted on
07/09/2009 4:04:04 PM PDT by
roses of sharon
(It is not actual suffering but a taste of better things which excites people to revolt: Hoffer)
To: P-Marlowe; jveritas
28 posted on
07/09/2009 5:22:32 PM PDT by
xzins
(Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends those who seek His help.)
To: ikez78; ml/nj; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; Polarik; Just A Nobody; Liz; ...
Most prominent Dummycrats took it as an article of faith that there was no connection between the Saddam regime and terror groups. Kerry and Obama ran in the last two presidential campaigns repeating this lie to support their foolish arguments against the war in Iraq.
In fact, there were ties to Iraq among the participants in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, as reported in Jayna Davis' book, The Third Terrorist. (The title is deceiving, because there were a slew of Iraqis in the plot, in which McVeigh and Nichols (who had been to Iraq with the US military) were merely a small part.)
To: ikez78
41 posted on
07/10/2009 9:54:10 PM PDT by
Dajjal
(Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson