To: pissant; June K.
OH MY! Kept on looking for the ‘humor’ or ‘satire’ tag, but there was none. Seriously, if a SCOTUS actually said this as a basis of natural-law, then we are in far more deep doo-doo than we realize :(
To: Mr_Moonlight
MM,
I just read all of that!
It’s truly unbelievable!
42 posted on
07/08/2009 7:12:46 PM PDT by
June K.
To: Mr_Moonlight
I never doubted that was the reason behind Roe v. Wade.
In conversations with both Democrats and "progressive" Republicans, because I'm white, they've felt comfortable telling me that even though they consider abortion a sin, it's necessary because "those people" reproduce so much.
It's something a lot of us knew, but Ginsburg just put it out on the table, assuming this article is accurate.
81 posted on
07/08/2009 7:33:18 PM PDT by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
Can somebody report on whether the NY Times actually reports this at all? I simply can't believe that they will print it, since it puts abortion and one of the "high priests of the left" in a very ugly light. And the Slimes has a long history of making sure the stories they tell jive with their beliefs, not the facts.
Mark
116 posted on
07/08/2009 7:55:27 PM PDT by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: Mr_Moonlight
Seriously, if a SCOTUS actually said this as a basis of natural-law, Hmmm, Natual Law? I'm curious as to what you mean.
183 posted on
07/09/2009 3:09:44 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
(On the tablets of the heart a law is written, the same for all men - St. Thomas Aquinas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson