Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater
"He doesn't want to fit in with the rest of the neighborhood," said Kevin Marrs, neighbor.

Tough s$^%. His property, not yours. Stupid home owners ASSociations.

Of course it is the fault of the home owner in the first place for buying a house covered by home owners ASSociation rules.

4 posted on 07/08/2009 11:29:06 AM PDT by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Domandred
Domandred said: "Of course it is the fault of the home owner in the first place for buying a house covered by home owners ASSociation rules."

That is certainly the case. Condominium style ownership makes more home available to some, at the cost of mutual ownership of some part of the property.

For the owner in the article, it was particularly unsuitable for him to have possession of an exterior part of the property and to be responsible to maintain it to suit some standard other than his own.

Years ago I ran afoul of a city ordinance regarding the same issue. I was an absentee owner, through financial circumstances, and couldn't maintain the yard to the city's standards. I think they billed me twice for services they determined to be warranted.

34 posted on 07/08/2009 11:54:07 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson