Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2009 3:33:43 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Man50D

BTTT!


2 posted on 07/08/2009 3:36:32 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Truly Constitutional money isn't just backed by gold and silver- it IS gold and silver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Brilliant thread !

“However, the ultimate effect was to create a mortgage tsunami that wrought devastation on the American people and economy,” says the report. “While government intervention was not the sole cause of the financial crisis, its role was significant and has received too little attention.”


3 posted on 07/08/2009 3:37:11 AM PDT by IrishMike (Liberalism is a psychological disorder and a dangerous mental illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Ping


4 posted on 07/08/2009 3:40:11 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/

In The News
Report: The Role of Government Affordable Housing Policy in Creating the Global Financial Crisis of 2008

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

WASHINGTON. D.C. – A report released today by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform finds that the housing bubble that burst in 2007 and led to a financial crisis can be traced back to federal government intervention in the U.S. housing market. The report’s findings are particularly significant and relevant since President Barack Obama’s announced financial reform initiatives do not include reforms to address flawed government housing initiatives.

http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/media/pdfs/20090707HousingCrisisReport.pdf


5 posted on 07/08/2009 3:44:00 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

The current meltdown in the mortgage industry is a direct result of giving mortgages to people who could not pay them back, a practice protected by Congressional Democrats.

Barack Obama the largest recipient of political funds from mortgage giants Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae.


6 posted on 07/08/2009 3:49:28 AM PDT by IrishMike (Liberalism is a psychological disorder and a dangerous mental illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

The talking heads on the MSM will be all over this.NOT


7 posted on 07/08/2009 3:49:42 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

With the rats in control of everything, nothing will be done to rectify this, nothing, it will continue open loop until all the wealth of the people is gone..


8 posted on 07/08/2009 3:50:48 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (The only time I want a Republican reaching across the aisle is to smack a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Well, finally some truth from our Washington politicians about what actually happened. From the Introduction (below), it looks like this is a report very much worth reading.

Bear in mind that this is detailed Congressional report about the underlying infractions of Freddie, Fannie, and pols like Barney Frank.

It’ll be interesting to see how much coverage it has gotten or will get int he MSM this week.

Prediction: none.

http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/media/pdfs/20090707HousingCrisisReport.pdf

The Role of Government Affordable Housing Policy in
Creating the Global Financial Crisis of 2008

STAFF REPORT
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
111TH CONGRESS
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM
JULY 7, 2009

INTRODUCTION

The housing bubble that burst in 2007 and led to a financial crisis can be traced back to federal government intervention in the U.S. housing market intended to help provide homeownership opportunities for more Americans. This intervention began with two government-backed corporations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which privatized their profits but socialized their risks, creating powerful incentives for them to act recklessly and exposing taxpayers to tremendous losses. Government intervention also created “affordable” but dangerous lending policies which encouraged lower down payments, looser underwriting standards and higher leverage. Finally, government intervention created a nexus of vested interests – politicians, lenders and lobbyists – who profited
from the “affordable” housing market and acted to kill reforms. In the short run, this government intervention was successful in its stated goal – raising the national
homeownership rate. However, the ultimate effect was to create a mortgage tsunami that wrought devastation on the American people and economy. While government
intervention was not the sole cause of the financial crisis, its role was significant and has received too little attention.

[snip]

In recent months it has been impossible to watch a television news program without seeing a Member of Congress or an Administration official put forward a new recovery
proposal or engage in the public flogging of a financial company official whose poor decisions, and perhaps greed, resulted in huge losses and great suffering. Ironically,
some of these same Washington officials were, all too recently, advocates of the very mortgage lending policies that led to economic turmoil. In a number of cases, political officials even engaged in unethical conduct, helping their political allies, family members
and even themselves obtain lucrative positions in the mortgage lending industry and other benefits. At a time when government intervention in private markets has become
alarmingly common, government “affordable housing” initiatives offer important lessons about the dangers of government efforts to manipulate or conjure outcomes in the market.


9 posted on 07/08/2009 3:50:59 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Obama must have got it. But he wasn’t born yet so it’s not his fault. Dictatorship is the only remedy. /sarc


10 posted on 07/08/2009 3:51:22 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Hit a few links and you can get the PDF report of about 26 pages, print that sucker off and pass it out.


12 posted on 07/08/2009 3:52:09 AM PDT by CommieCutter (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs/ht/qt/3013_08.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

bookmark


14 posted on 07/08/2009 3:54:59 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theKid51

Ping
for later


16 posted on 07/08/2009 3:59:04 AM PDT by theKid51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Fire up the crickets!


17 posted on 07/08/2009 4:01:15 AM PDT by Edgar3 (America is suffering from "Sorosis" of the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were the chief culprits in the housing crisis...” and in other breaking news water is wet.


19 posted on 07/08/2009 4:02:17 AM PDT by W.Lee (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Has anyone seen barney lately?I think we need to have a little talk.


20 posted on 07/08/2009 4:10:04 AM PDT by taxtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

bttt


21 posted on 07/08/2009 4:11:58 AM PDT by Matthew James (SPEARHEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
The report argues that lowered lending standards were the cause of the housing crisis and did not exempt the Republicans or the Bush administration from blame. It said placing certain lending quotas for under-served populations allowed “both Democratic and Republican administrations to consistently make campaign promises to boost homeownership through government intervention in the market.

Consequently, under both the Clinton and Bush administrations, HUD dramatically increased these quotas, which reached their zenith when the Bush administration raised them to 56 percent, 27 percent and 39 percent, respectively.”

What we've been saying all along. Maybe now some of those that excoriated us will finally believe.

23 posted on 07/08/2009 4:23:47 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

BTTT.


24 posted on 07/08/2009 4:28:42 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Thanks for the thread. Great information that confirms what many of us thought.


28 posted on 07/08/2009 4:49:57 AM PDT by Techster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

ping


31 posted on 07/08/2009 4:55:08 AM PDT by BruCru (I think, therefore I am conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson