Posted on 07/07/2009 8:43:57 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Ping!
Thanks for the daily laugh, GGG. Creation Science...that’s a good one. (chuckle)
Just doing my part to expose your fellow materialist co-religionists in the atheist “science” movement.
Spamming again?
You said — Thanks for the daily laugh, GGG. Creation Science...that’s a good one. (chuckle)
—
Well, since I read this... “While Eugenie Scott may not ever take up the title of the most hated woman in America after Madalyn Murray O’Hair, she nonetheless is attempting to counter American public opinion on the creation-evolution controversy, where a recent Gallup poll demonstrated that over 60 percent of Americans believe in recent creation and not in evolution.”
It is good to see you laughing at the larger number of people who don’t agree with you.... LOL...
Of course, we all know what the definition of a fool is... don’t we?
Don't forget James von Brunn, with the practical application side of it....
You said — Spamming again?
—
Ummmm.., talk about “spamming”..., well I can identify a lot of “spamming” going on here on Free Republic, which people encourage, so apparently this is a “relative definition”...
For example, I see a *lot of spamming* going on about Obama’s birth certificate (just in a “technical tense” and definition). And then I see a lot of “anti-Obama spam” going on every day. And also I see a lot of “global warming” spam happening here every day.
You see, the definition of “spam” is similar to the definition of a “troll” that is used here on Free Republic by other posters.
The real simple definition of “spam” that works for just about everyone here on Free Republic is —
“Whatever topic or area that is posted about again and again, every day, that I don’t want to see or read about.”
I say that it’s like the Free Republic definition of “troll” too, in that this is defined as...
“A troll is someone who posts something that I disagree with.”
THEREFORE, I think you should have said (instead of the above) — “I don’t like this spamming troll” and that would have more more accurate of your sentiments...
It’s a good thing that we don’t all have your mentality... LOL...
It’s really too bad that there are certain people that are *so rabid* in their anti-God thinking that they want to label the majority of Americans and their thinking in that category of that picture you’ve supplied us with.
Yep, just more anti-God mentality, that seems to be running rampant, here, too...
LOL! Darwin Derangement Syndrome
The writer of this article is clueless. Eugenie Scott has been around for many years.
Materialist science, what will they think of next?
You didn’t have to click on the link, you know, and you clearly have added nothing to the conversation. Why don’t you go back to spamming anti-Palin diatribes...
Dude...if that is supposed to be your ancestor...you haven’t evolved.
Not relative to how long Darwinism has been around. Interestingly enough, Eugenie Scott has cautioned her fellow co-religionist evo-scientists against debating creationists because the Evo-atheists routinely get eaten for lunch by the same.
Thank you for summing up the Darwinist postion.
Yeah, she wrote that article 15 years ago!
Once again, clueless author if she thinks she's a "new face".
GGG loves his materialist computer. He still won’t tell me why he doesn’t pray his messages to God and let him post them on FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.