Spamming again?
You said — Spamming again?
—
Ummmm.., talk about “spamming”..., well I can identify a lot of “spamming” going on here on Free Republic, which people encourage, so apparently this is a “relative definition”...
For example, I see a *lot of spamming* going on about Obama’s birth certificate (just in a “technical tense” and definition). And then I see a lot of “anti-Obama spam” going on every day. And also I see a lot of “global warming” spam happening here every day.
You see, the definition of “spam” is similar to the definition of a “troll” that is used here on Free Republic by other posters.
The real simple definition of “spam” that works for just about everyone here on Free Republic is —
“Whatever topic or area that is posted about again and again, every day, that I don’t want to see or read about.”
I say that it’s like the Free Republic definition of “troll” too, in that this is defined as...
“A troll is someone who posts something that I disagree with.”
THEREFORE, I think you should have said (instead of the above) — “I don’t like this spamming troll” and that would have more more accurate of your sentiments...
It’s a good thing that we don’t all have your mentality... LOL...
You didn’t have to click on the link, you know, and you clearly have added nothing to the conversation. Why don’t you go back to spamming anti-Palin diatribes...