Al Gore proves once again he is certifiable.
He really needs some professional help.
Problem is, bull**** is a renewable resource. No matter how many times you get rid of it, it always piles up again.
Give it up Al ... your scam is quickly unraveling
Al, of course, being the climate change Nazi.
Yeah, with the global warmists as the Nazis. You got it backwards, but hey, nice try, Algoebbels.
The rule is, the first to call the other side Nazis loses, so algore has officially lost!
Somehow whenever conservatives liken something to Nazis they get clobbered for the cliche, but when liberals do it? they hang on every word!
This type of over-the-top, hysterical melodrama proves that al Gore deserves only a good horse laugh, nothing more.
Textbook freudian projection.
He’s right. He just has the sides flipped around. The warmers are the Nazis. Question a true believer in man-made-global-warming long enough and you’ll see that it all boils down to eugenics. If they had their way, they’d be exterminating people to ‘save the planet’.
I believe some government organization in the UK, even suggested eliminating half of the UK population to stop warming.
And Al---YOU and global warming alarmists ARE the Nazis.
vaudine
He’s got it half-right. It is a battle against the enviro-nazis for liberty and economic freedom. He’s just a little off about which side he is on.
He's the Rodney Dangerfield of global politics.
Gore stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars if people buy this crap so of course he sees Climate Change as a battle against the Nazis. Fact is, he’s the Nazi so in a way it is a battle against Nazis (like him). He’s got it wrong way round; reminds me of when Gore claimed his favorite Bible verse is John 16:3 - oh the irony!
Godwin’s law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Mike Godwin, creator of the law.
Godwin’s Law (also known as Godwin’s Rule of Nazi Analogies)[1] is a humorous observation coined by Mike Godwin in 1990, and which has become an Internet adage. It states: “As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.”[2][3]
Godwin’s Law is often cited in online discussions as a deterrent against the use of arguments in the widespread reductio ad Hitlerum form. The rule does not make any statement about whether any particular reference or comparison to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate, but only asserts that the likelihood of such a reference or comparison arising increases as the discussion progresses. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[4] that overuse of Nazi and Hitler comparisons should be avoided, because it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.
Although in one of its early forms Godwin’s Law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions,[5] the law is now applied to any threaded online discussion: electronic mailing lists, message boards, chat rooms, and more recently blog comment threads and wiki talk pages.