Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters

Funny that I can ask to see if a patient is in a hospital and his room number from a hospital directory service over the phone and get it, but this hospital will not confirm or deny if Obama was born there 48 years ago.


117 posted on 07/06/2009 8:58:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
Funny that I can ask to see if a patient is in a hospital and his room number from a hospital directory service over the phone and get it, but this hospital will not confirm or deny if Obama was born there 48 years ago.

Nor will they confirm if his mother was admitted in the circa 1961 time frame. I guess she still has a right to privacy, despite being dead for a goodly number of years.

123 posted on 07/06/2009 9:15:17 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
Maybe we are asking about the wrong patient.

1. Remember this: It is NOT Barack Obama who we need to find information about concerning Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.

2. Rather, it is HIS mother Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama.

3. My point is this:I believe that Kapiolani hospital officials are very clever indeed, for this reason: By continously focusing over and over again the issue on whether or not a Barack Obama was ever a patient at the hospital, Kapiolani hospital distracts reporters and the public from the REAL issue: Whether or not a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama was a patient on Aug.4, 1961---the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii That is, in my opinion, by hiding behind Barack Obama, it can distract reporters and the public from the real person we want to know about: Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.

4. My point is this: I don't see how Kapiolani can legally DENY a reporter's request or a lawyer's request for information concerning a Stanley Ann Dunham---or any variation of that name--who may have been a patient at the hospital about 50 years ago, even if it can continually say over and over again---and hide behind federal privacy laws---that it cannot reveal information about one Barack Obama from 50 years ago.

5. NOTE: I don't understand how President Obama can legally stop Kapiolani hospital from officially telling the public if a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama was a patient on Aug.4,1961. If anyone can help me with this, I would appreciate it.

6. Again, our investigation must not be distracted or misguided by trying to find out information on patient Barack back in Aug. 4,1961. That is what the Obama camp happily wants us to waste our resources and energy on.

7. Rather, we should re-focus our energy and resources on putting continuous pressure on Kapiolani to tell us whether or not a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama was ever a patient there on Aug.4, 1961, the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.

152 posted on 07/07/2009 12:43:01 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson