Replies

Maybe we are asking about the wrong patient.

1. Remember this: It is NOT Barack Obama who we need to find information about concerning Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.

2. Rather, it is HIS mother Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama.

3. My point is this:I believe that Kapiolani hospital officials are very clever indeed, for this reason: By continously focusing over and over again the issue on whether or not a Barack Obama was ever a patient at the hospital, Kapiolani hospital distracts reporters and the public from the REAL issue: Whether or not a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama was a patient on Aug.4, 1961---the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii That is, in my opinion, by hiding behind Barack Obama, it can distract reporters and the public from the real person we want to know about: Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.

4. My point is this: I don't see how Kapiolani can legally DENY a reporter's request or a lawyer's request for information concerning a Stanley Ann Dunham---or any variation of that name--who may have been a patient at the hospital about 50 years ago, even if it can continually say over and over again---and hide behind federal privacy laws---that it cannot reveal information about one Barack Obama from 50 years ago.

5. NOTE: I don't understand how President Obama can legally stop Kapiolani hospital from officially telling the public if a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama was a patient on Aug.4,1961. If anyone can help me with this, I would appreciate it.

6. Again, our investigation must not be distracted or misguided by trying to find out information on patient Barack back in Aug. 4,1961. That is what the Obama camp happily wants us to waste our resources and energy on.

7. Rather, we should re-focus our energy and resources on putting continuous pressure on Kapiolani to tell us whether or not a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama was ever a patient there on Aug.4, 1961, the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.