[editor-surveyor]

"But it’s certainly far more believable to assume some imperfect preservation from 4,000 - 5,000 years ago rather than 60 million years."

Even more believable that they were from less than 2000 years ago. There is a vast amount of cultural and artistic evidence that says that the dinos were recently alive. The logician and the scientist will accept that evidence, but the old-earthers and evolutionists will writhe in denial.

[dinodino]

I try to look away from these threads, but I couldn’t resist replying to your post.

Do you *seriously* believe that dinosaurs walked the earth 2000 years ago? I mean, that’s not only within recorded history, but there were quite a few historians writing at the time. Don’t you think that if dinosaurs were around 2500 years ago that maybe Herodotus and Thucydides would have commented on them?

Your post is just plain silly.

[Blackacre]

There is a vast amount of cultural and artistic evidence that says that the dinos were recently alive.

Not really. And there is certainly no physical evidence. If there were dinosaurs alive 2000 years ago, we'd be discovering dinosaur bones, rather than just fossils.

[Travis T. OJustice]

There is a vast amount of cultural and artistic evidence that says that the dinos were recently alive.

But no legitimate scientific evidence?