To: editor-surveyor
There is a vast amount of cultural and artistic evidence that says that the dinos were recently alive. But no legitimate scientific evidence?
31 posted on
07/06/2009 10:24:23 AM PDT by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
To: Travis T. OJustice
To prove that dinosaurs existed 2000 years ago, all this poster has to do is show us a dinosaurs bone (rather than a fossil).
And the T-Rex “soft tissue” doesn’t count, as all of the organic content there was replaced with minerals.
To: Travis T. OJustice
"
But no legitimate scientific evidence?" You have no idea what scientific evidence is, do you!
Stop wasting my time with your childish 'gotcha' posts.
43 posted on
07/06/2009 10:41:08 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Travis T. OJustice; editor-surveyor
There is a vast amount of cultural and artistic evidence that says that the dinos were recently alive. But no legitimate scientific evidence?
Cultural and artistic evidence isn't legitimate, then, by that reasoning.
Not all *scientific* evidence is legitimate either. Witness Piltdown Man, archaeoraptor, etc. Or even misidentified skeletons like the*Hobbit* fossil.
You can't assume that because it's labeled *scientific* it's legitimate. Nor if it's cultural or artistic that it's not legitimate.
151 posted on
07/21/2009 9:17:53 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson