Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JACKSONS WANTS TO DELAY NAMING OF ESTATE EXECUTOR
NY Post ^ | July 6, 2009

Posted on 07/06/2009 8:02:08 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

LOS ANGELES -- Michael Jackson's family wants a judge to delay a hearing Monday to designate two men listed in the pop superstar's will as temporary administrators of his estate so that they can look deeper into his affairs, a person close to the family said.

The family also wants the additional time to wait and see if another will emerges, as well as to accommodate Jackson's memorial service Tuesday, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak publicly.

The person said Sunday that the family wants the delay in naming two men, attorney John Branca and music executive John McClain, who are designated in a five-page will filed Wednesday as administrators to shepherd Jackson's estate into a private trust.

Jackson's mother, Katherine Jackson, was granted some limited powers over the singer's estate days after his death. But because Branca and McClain are named as executors in the 2002 will, it's expected that they would be granted more authority to oversee Jackson's estate, estimated in court filings as being worth more than $500 million, in Monday's scheduled hearing.

Jackson's mother and those close to her want "time to further investigate the circumstances and individuals that were surrounding Michael Jackson during his final days," the person close to the family said.

In court filings, attorneys for Katherine Jackson ask Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff to delay naming Branca and McClain as the estate's administrators. Attorneys for the two men argue their appointment is crucial to controlling Jackson's diverse financial interests and its liabilities, which include refunds due on a series of London concerts that have been canceled, and several lawsuits.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeljackson
Can't load them fast enough.


1 posted on 07/06/2009 8:02:08 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Insert the phrase “money grubbing father” at each point where the word “family” is used and the article makes a lot more sense.


2 posted on 07/06/2009 8:04:22 AM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

This is so improper. Unless a later will/trust has popped up the court would be derilict in its duty not to appoint these men as so stated in the will.

Unless the Jackson’s can bring forth evidence at the hearing, these men should be appointed post haste.


3 posted on 07/06/2009 8:04:50 AM PDT by waxer1 ( "The Bible is the rock on which our republic rests." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Those children will have nothing left after these leeches get hold of his money. In a lot of ways, I can kind of understand why Jackson was so weird. The people who were supposed to love him unconditionally saw him as a money tree. Very sad.


4 posted on 07/06/2009 8:05:24 AM PDT by Texas_shutterbug (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Another dead celebrity... another money-grubbing family. I hope a judge throws out this request and honors Jackson’s will as stated.


5 posted on 07/06/2009 8:06:11 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

And what was up with those moving vans, looting the place the very day after he died? Reports were that they were hired by Janet Jackson.


6 posted on 07/06/2009 8:10:53 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
Actually Think we are witnessing a power struggle between Nation of Islam and the promoters.
7 posted on 07/06/2009 8:10:53 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

According to the will, the two executors are suppose to give everything to his mother and children anyway.

Don’t see where this will make a difference.


8 posted on 07/06/2009 8:12:58 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Trusts for children can have a lot of limits, especially in California (see Olsen twins, Caulkins, etc.). In some cases the guardian is not allowed much access except for specified allowances. Depending on how the trust operates, the children’s portions may be virtually untouchable until they reach majority age.


9 posted on 07/06/2009 8:22:25 AM PDT by PrincessB (The change he's peddling isn't something I believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
If you can delay the final probate of the will there will be a lot of expenses that have to be handled by the estate. For example, if you can make sure some "generous" friends get an overpriced contract for upkeep on Neverland for a year or three, you can get quite a few kickbacks. Then pick someone who will handle monkey chow purchases for Bubbles, someone to write thank you letters at $200/hour, someone to handle investigations of miraculous apparitions of Michael Jackson (Family Sees Image Of Michael Jackson In Tree Stump), etc. Multiply that by a hundred for all the jobs that have to be done and suddenly a lot of money is flowing that would be shut off by an executor looking out solely for the best interest of the final inheritors.
10 posted on 07/06/2009 8:24:14 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Where there’s a will there’s a relative.


11 posted on 07/06/2009 8:25:13 AM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
According to the will, the two executors are suppose to give everything to his mother and children anyway.

But absolutely nothing to the father. I'm sure he would like to have the executor under his control, for starters.

12 posted on 07/06/2009 8:25:52 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Boy did Whacko Jacko get his estate planning bass ackwards.

You're supposted to put your assets into Trust before you die and name a successor trustee to replace yourself in the trust.

Since there is no executor named and the "family" is petitioning a Judge, guess what court we are talking about??? It's called Probate.

This means that if the estate is trully worth millions, ZeroBama and Arnold are going to want about 60% of it.

13 posted on 07/06/2009 8:30:50 AM PDT by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
Insert the phrase “money grubbing father” at each point where the word “family” is used and the article makes a lot more sense.

You got that right. Watching his slimy father slink around---promoting himself and a record label---as his son lies dead is nauseating.

No wonder Michael was weird---- one story has his father dressed in a fright mask entering little Michael's room through a window as he lay sound asleep---then shreiking and screaming----scaring the dayights out of the little boy. Daddy Dearest also supposedly hung Michael upside down and beat him if he did not do as he was told.

14 posted on 07/06/2009 8:40:10 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Its my understanding that the perv had about a half a billion dollars in debt. Wouldn’t the people/institutions he owes money to have first crack at his estate, leaving nothing, when the dust settles?


15 posted on 07/06/2009 8:48:37 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Forget going Galt. Its time to go Braveheart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sig Sauer P220
The executors would be involved in the sale of any assets out of the estate (say, the Beatles' music portfolio) for purposes of liquidating said assets and retiring at least part of that debt. The creditors don't want to seize physical propoerty - they want the estate to liquidate the assets and pay up.

This is going to be in the news for years to come.

16 posted on 07/06/2009 9:13:51 AM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

His parents are still married in a common law California state.

Also, we do not know what the Trust says as the will only stipulates the rules of the Trust to be maintained. He may have an allowance to his father in the trust.

We just don’t know.


17 posted on 07/06/2009 9:49:21 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
The family also wants the additional time to wait and see if another a better will emerges...
18 posted on 07/06/2009 9:54:55 AM PDT by scott7278 (Obama, Klaatu barada nikto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson