Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cop shooting called self-defense
newsobserver.com ^ | 4 July, 2009 | STANLEY B. CHAMBERS JR.

Posted on 07/04/2009 5:00:38 AM PDT by marktwain

DURHAM -- As a Durham officer shot Thursday recovers from a second surgery, relatives of the man charged in the shooting say he acted in self-defense.

Officer D.J. Youmans remained in stable condition at Duke Hospital Friday. His family has arrived from New York to be with him.

"We're just praying a whole lot," Durham Police Chief Jose L. Lopez Sr. said before returning to the hospital Friday afternoon.

Youmans, a Durham officer for less than two months, and his training officer, Cpl. B.D. Schnee, were responding to a shots-fired call at the South Square Townhomes on Shannon Road about 4 a.m. Thursday. Officers at a nearby police substation heard the gunshots and were headed to the area when emergency dispatchers notified them of a burglary in apartment 5-A.

Youmans, 32, a former New York City police officer, was struck just above the waist in an area his bulletproof vest did not protect.

Thomas Rashawn Monroe, 23, who lives in the apartment, has been charged with the shooting. He remained in the Durham County jail Friday in lieu of $250,000 bail.

Monroe's relatives said Friday that police did not identify themselves when they arrived and that, for all the people in the apartment knew, whoever had been shooting earlier was outside the door.

Cynthia Bridges, 47, said she was preparing for work when she heard the first shots. She dropped to the floor and dialed 911. Her sons, ages 23 and 24, 29-year-old daughter and 4-year-old granddaughter were asleep, she said.

More shots can be heard on the 911 call as Bridges frantically speaks to an emergency dispatcher.

Her son Michael Monroe was sleeping on the living room couch when the shooting started. Thomas Monroe came down to check on him and when the shooting stopped, the younger Monroe ran to his brother. They hid from the front door as the shooting resumed. Moments later, when they heard the screen door open, shots were fired from inside, Michael Monroe said.

"They ain't say they were the police," he said. "If they said they were the police, we would have no need to fire."

Bridges said she doesn't know who riddled her apartment with bullets or why. There were three holes on an upstairs bedroom door, another at her bedroom window. Some bullets made it from the front door to the back of the home. She pointed to more than 30 bullet holes.

Investigators didn't leave the residence until about 1 a.m. Friday, said Bridges, who added that the gunshots sounded like machine-gun fire.

"When I see the front door, it lets me know the seriousness of the shooting," said Bridges, who has lived in the apartment for five years.

Preliminary reports indicate that officers announced themselves before shots were fired from inside the apartment, Chief Lopez said. The Police Department's training unit is evaluating the situation. Investigators are also looking into the incident leading to the officer's shooting.

"You don't shoot not knowing who you're shooting at," Lopez said. "I think the violence surrounding that [incident] needs to be addressed, and I hope the community will continue to be outraged and come forward. Someone knows who shot up that house and why."

Michael Monroe said he ran upstairs and told Bridges and the child to get down. Then the two brothers went outside and saw the police officers. He said they would have walked outside sooner had they known police were on the other side.

"My son ain't tryin' to shoot no cop," Bridges said. "That man was an innocent man. We don't know him. Why would we want to shoot him for? I'm praying that nothing happens to this guy."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: banglist; homedefense; nc; police
Not a lot of details to go on with this one. At minimum, the dispatcher should have let the people inside know the police had arrived.
1 posted on 07/04/2009 5:00:39 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Were the cops in uniform?


2 posted on 07/04/2009 5:10:11 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Under such circumstances would you shoot?


3 posted on 07/04/2009 5:15:38 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Nothing clear here...except that Mother Bridges has a lot of twenty-something pigeons roosting.


4 posted on 07/04/2009 5:16:59 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Today I learned why people sometimes shoot their televisions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Cynthia Bridges, 47, said she was preparing for work when she heard the first shots.

"When I see the front door, it lets me know the seriousness of the shooting," said Bridges

"My son ain't tryin' to shoot no cop," Bridges said. "That man was an innocent man. We don't know him. Why would we want to shoot him for?

Hopefully mama Bridges 'work' isn't ain't as an ENGLISH Teacher, no how.

;-)

5 posted on 07/04/2009 5:27:41 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

> Under such circumstances would you shoot?
Yes !!


6 posted on 07/04/2009 5:41:34 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama = Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

> Under such circumstances would you shoot?
Yes !!
But not if they were in uniform.


7 posted on 07/04/2009 5:42:43 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama = Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Through a door at God knows who? No.


8 posted on 07/04/2009 6:04:02 AM PDT by sig226 (Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
“They ain't say they were the police,” he said. “If they said they were the police, we would have no need to fire.”

Is the line I noticed. I often wonder what folks who speak like this expect their job opportunities to be..PR director for a large corp with a 100k salary and perks??? I will be the first to admit messing up some of our fine language but not due to lack of trying!

9 posted on 07/04/2009 6:48:04 AM PDT by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
"Under such circumstances would you shoot?"

Based only on the details we have here? I'd have unloaded through that door, yes sir.

10 posted on 07/04/2009 7:06:18 AM PDT by Lloyd227 (Class of 1998 (let's all help the Team McCain spider monkeys decide how to moderate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

QUOTE: Under such circumstances would you shoot?

Rule 4: Know your target and what’s behind it.


11 posted on 07/04/2009 7:08:38 AM PDT by Peet (<- A.K.A. the Foundling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Under such circumstances would you shoot?

Several questions need answered.

Were the officers in uniform?

Did they or did they not announce that they were police, and if not, then why not?

Who was firing INTO the apartment?

Were the police employing a fully accredited ebonics translator throughout the incident?

12 posted on 07/04/2009 7:19:42 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Problem is, home invaders have been known to call out that they are the police just to deceive the occupants. Under the circumstances I don't blame the occupants for firing through the door. In hindsight it might not seem to have been prudent, but in real time--thirty shots coming through the door at them--I can't fault them for their response.

I guess I agree with the poster who suggested that the dispatcher should ensured the occupants knew the police had arrived. If the dispatcher did attempt to do that, this might just be one those unfortunate situations where no one was at fault--except, for the bad guy(s) who shot up the door to begin with.

13 posted on 07/04/2009 7:24:26 AM PDT by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker
I often wonder what folks who speak like this expect their job opportunities to be..PR director for a large corp with a 100k salary and perks???
Exactly. But to critique this 'language' usage (its not even Ebonics) will get you labeled a racist and subject to a Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton tongue lashing.

I will be the first to admit messing up some of our fine language but not due to lack of trying!
:-)
I grew up on the Southwest Side of Chicago. While not exactly as bad as a Brooklyn 'accent', we suuuure could butcher English. Like: 'hunnert', 'over by dare', 'goin to da jewels', and 'sout side'. And 'da' was used instead of 'the' all the time. A prime example is the current Mayor Richie Daley, from my then nearby neighborhood of 'Bridgeport'. He had to take Diction Lessons for a couple years before he went into politics so he could lose his 'Bridgeport accent'.

But as bad as all that was. It 'ain't' even close to what these people say today. And NO amount of Billions thrown down the Black Hole of 'Publik Skuuls', will correct it.

14 posted on 07/04/2009 7:26:21 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: behzinlea
“Problem is, home invaders have been known to call out that they are the police just to deceive the occupants.”

Not only that, but they have been known to wear shirts/jackets with “Police” or “DEA” or “FBI” on them, and body armor as well. I have seen several cases where that ploy was used. I particularly remember a couple cases in Phoenix and one in Texas.

15 posted on 07/04/2009 8:26:25 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Abso effing lutely


16 posted on 07/04/2009 8:28:30 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Very sad all around. It’s entirely likely the police didn’t announce themselves, in which case the resident was entirely right in firing on them. Unfortunately, it’s nearly impossible to successfully use self defense against a policeman because society is so engrained in the worship of the police culture to where a LEO can do almost anything with impunity but heaven help anyone who acts to defend themselves against a rogue cop.


17 posted on 07/04/2009 10:08:03 AM PDT by Dayman (My 1919a4 is named Charlotte. When I light her up she has the voice of an angel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dayman

There are way too many “undercover”, Plainclothed” or Swat uniformed officers going around acting like they are part of a military invasion force. Police officers should have clearly marked UNIFORMS.


18 posted on 07/04/2009 2:02:46 PM PDT by Rocketwolf68 (Bring back the crusades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Were the cops in uniform?

At 4 am can one tell the difference in the dark. The article does not read that the lights were on or off.

19 posted on 07/05/2009 7:17:41 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (I once had an awkward moment just to see how it felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Were the cops in uniform?

At 4 am can one tell the difference in the dark. The article does not read that the lights were on or off.

20 posted on 07/05/2009 7:20:15 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (I once had an awkward moment just to see how it felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson