Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More tax oppression: And it's unnecessary for revenue-raising
The Washington Times ^ | July 2, 2009 | Richard W. Rahn

Posted on 07/02/2009 3:02:22 AM PDT by Scanian

Why did a bare majority (219-212) of the members of the U.S. Congress vote for the largest tax increase in American history this past Friday, under the claim it was a vote to save the climate?

Before you answer the question, consider the following facts. The proponents claim this tax bill will reduce U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, which are purported to cause global warming. First, despite the claims of President Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and many in the media, there is no consensus in the scientific community about how much climate change, other than the normal cycles, is taking place, nor how severe it will be, and how much man-made CO2 is responsible. None of the climate models predicted the unexpected global cooling of the last decade.

It is known that the legislation will have a negligible effect on global CO2 emissions, particularly since the big polluters, such as China and India, are not playing ball. It is also known that the "cap and trade" system that the legislation calls for has been a failure in Europe, where it has been in operation for the last few years, in that it has proven to be far more costly than envisioned, has not met the CO2 reduction targets, and has been highly susceptible to corruption and abuse.

In addition, because the legislation requires Americans to use more inefficient energy (wind and solar) sources, it cannot help but raise costs for American businesses and citizens, and hence will kill jobs rather than create them (as contrasted to what Mr. Obama and Mrs. Pelosi have incorrectly claimed).

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: captax

1 posted on 07/02/2009 3:02:22 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian
unneccessary???

"counter productive" may be a better description.

2 posted on 07/02/2009 3:03:44 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
susceptible to corruption and abuse. NO WAY! HOW CAN THIS BE with the Democrats in charge of it? Why, they are all so morally pure and intellectually superior!
3 posted on 07/02/2009 3:13:01 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Give me LIBERTY or give me an M-24A2!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; All

Did you hear about the ASPS award ? Its in
http://www.theusmat.com/


4 posted on 07/02/2009 3:25:20 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (We don't need no stinkin video clips unrelated to the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Enron already worked this scam with the trading of “sulfur dioxide credits”?
Enron is now out of business and lots of Enron executives are in jail. Enron grew huge because of the gullibility of the public in believing all these environmental hoaxes.


5 posted on 07/02/2009 4:09:47 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama means Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

“counter productive”?

I’d go with anti-Constitutional, illegal, politically bankrupt, insane...

The American public must wake up to the realities of the 0bamunists, and soon. Much more of this and we won’t have a country to save.


6 posted on 07/02/2009 4:11:31 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

This is about raising taxes for more government spending, pure and simple.


7 posted on 07/02/2009 5:35:53 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
...consensus in the scientific community...

Two words that do not belong in the same thought.

8 posted on 07/02/2009 6:06:25 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Too many zeros in the budget. And the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian; Calm_Cool_and_Elected

ping for later


9 posted on 07/02/2009 6:28:49 AM PDT by Calm_Cool_and_Elected (So many books, so little time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson